User talk:Michael.rudelli

Welcome!

 * }

June 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2013 has been reverted. Your edit here to New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2013 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://eagletonpollblog.wordpress.com/2013/04/12/head-to-head-with-buono-christie-continues-a-strong-lead-but/, http://eagletonpollblog.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/christie-re-election-support-soars-in-sandy-aftermath/, http://eagletonpollblog.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/christie-re-election-support-soars-in-sandy-aftermath/, http://eagletonpollblog.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/christie-re-election-support-soars-in-sandy-aftermath/, http://eagletonpollblog.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/christie-re-election-support-soars-in-sandy-aftermath/, http://eagletonpollblog.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/christie-re-election-support-soars-in-sandy-aftermath/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2013 with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC) Hi User:Tbhotch, I don't see how the link to the NJ department of elections page showing "Michael Rudelli" as a Candidate is inappropriate. As a matter of fact, I don't think it gets more appropriate than that. Can anyone just delete this for no good reason?

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to New Jersey gubernatorial election, 2013 with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  05:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Michael.rudelli. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Neil N   talk to me  06:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)