User talk:Michael21107

August 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating the topic ban that was a condition of your unblock, with a completely inappropriate CSD-tagging at that, immediately after giving assurances at AN/I that you would stop rushing into things regarding deletion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 02:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC) from Z1720 posted on your talk page on the 31st July to which you responded. Its right there in your talk page history. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Im asking bout a topic ban — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael21107 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 8 August 2023 (UTC).
 * Those conditions are what was meant when referring to topic bans. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * thanks Michael H (talk) 11:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Michael, I'm going to again suggest that as opposed to trying to get unblocked again as soon as possible, that perhaps you instead spend some time on another wiki, such as Simple or Fandom, or if you have a primary language other than English, that you edit that wiki instead. Take some time, try to become as proficient as you can at the basics, as in: selecting articles that need improvement, and doing just that, nothing fancy or complicated. Also take the time to learn the policies & guidelines as thoroughly as you can, and work on your communication skills. both conveying your thoughts and ideas to others, as well as understanding those being communicated to you. WP isn't going anywhere, so take your time, (at least 6 months, though 12 would probably be better). I think that if you try this approach, you might have a better chance of success. (jmho) - w o lf  10:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * the thing is I'm not here to succeed (if u don't mean just getting unbanned), right now I just want to not be banned indefinitely for tagging one CSD, I would say giving me another chance and then banning me for 12 months if I fuck up would be reasonable Michael H (talk) 12:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Listen, Michael, I try to not be a hard-ass admin. I make a lot of blocks, but try to never jump to blocking, and try to give due consideration to every unblock request. But here, like, you keep saying it was just "one CSD", but it's not like CSD-tagging is the sort of thing someone easily stumbles into by accident. I'd be more sympathetic if, for instance, you were banned from American politics and made a single edit in that topic area, because that's an easy mistake to make once. But you were unblocked on a condition of no more CSD-tagging. You then deliberately added a custom db-G6 template (and not even a valid one) to a redirect. That's not stumbling into an accidental violation; that's intentionally doing something that you were told you'd be reblocked if you ever did again. And you did that immediately after I said I was considering a block and that you needed to slow down and stop plunging into areas you don't understand. (Which is relevant because, again, "not necessary redirect" is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. I strongly doubt that that redirect would even be deleted at RfD, let alone speedily.)If I didn't get the sense that you really are trying your best, I would assume you were trolling here, because that's such a blatant violation at a time when you were under a lot of scrutiny. But I don't think that. I think you just still don't get it. I'd suggest you start by focusing on a wiki where you speak the language more fluently. Give it a few months. If, after a few months, an admin from that wiki is willing to come here and say you now understand how to contribute in a wiki environment, I'll be open to an unblock. For now, it's a hard oppose for me. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 17:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * i dont know what i was thinking at the time, probably was just looking for a resonable way to delete it cuz that just looked like a redundant redirect idk, i know what u trying to say but i dont like editing “fictisious” wikis, i think that i can do no harm if u unblock me until i do next big mistake Michael H (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

@Ivanvector i can understand policies, how can i prove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael21107 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * That's what you said last time you were blocked. Why should we believe it this time? JBW (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I would say because i have much more knowledge of Wikipedia now. I know u cant verify that certainly but i hope u will try if possible, by unblocking me if needed. If u have better idea, I'm open to it. Michael H (talk) 22:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You're apparently serving a month-long block on sk.wiki for "trolling, unproductive edits and bringing chaos to articles" so I'd say that's considerable evidence to the contrary. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 08:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * i believe thats only evidence of sk wiki being in a terrible state, what even is trolling? bringing chaos into articles? admins there can make up reasons for bans and get away with it Michael H (talk) 23:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * anyway i believe that even if i wouldnt be able to edit wiki with 15 yo rules like having to link dates, it doesnt mean i cant do so at this, in comparision polished wiki Michael H (talk) 00:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

what should i do when only one person helpfully acknowledged my request for such a long time?--Michael H (talk) 15:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Not sure any deletion related tagging is a good idea, but does this suffice? &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Can you tell us more specifically what specific steps you will take to comply and what edits you intend to make instead? &#45;-  Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * i would obey the topic bans which prohibit me from tagging articles for speedy deletion and making more then 1 revert on a article in 24 hour period, not sure if u want to hear about alternatives to that or what, i would of course accept any further topic bans but not sure what more do you want me to tell you Michael H (talk) 11:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

 * I think the block evasion precludes unblocking, but maybe one of my colleagues will assent to unblocking.&#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Please describe what constructive edits you would make.&#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * any constructive edits, like fixing links and linked broken anchors, I dont know if u mean like some specific topics or something, if u you mean like topics, mostly minor stuff i come across from the beginning so i get some experience Michael H (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Deepfriedokra Michael H (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * not an opinion on the appeal, but I see no further block evasion since the previous decline. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * {cringe} Thanks. Let's await further review by a member of the unblock review team. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)