User talk:MichaelAdamReale

June 2018
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Self-help groups for mental health. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 23:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Melcous (talk) 00:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

User-generated content
Hello, your additions to several articles have been reverted because they are user-generated content. UGC, with few exceptions, is not a reliable source and cannot be used for the purposes of citation on Wikipedia. Additionally, your username matches the cited author of those UGC sources so please also keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion. RA 0808 talkcontribs 18:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

All of the work that I did has been delete without even being reviewed first? Seriously? I am livid. I was not trying to self-promote but rather sharing what knowledge that I have, having been in that field. I am sorry if I offended. Honestly, at this juncture, I'd like to delete my account. I wont be doing any more entries as obviously it is a waist of my time.

Spamming health.wikinut.com
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Jytdog (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Really
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. See WP:PROMO. We get everybody from DuPont to Greenpeace here abusing our beautiful project to promote their views or products.

I get it that you are a "good guy" but the way you are abusing WP to cite your own pieces is as ugly as somebody dumping industrial waste into a national park. Please stop it. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Jytdog (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

I understand that but there is more information in the article that I was citing with information which I cites in the article.

I sincerely thought that I was making a contribution to the knowledge base rather than dumping info into the Wiki article.MichaelAdamReale (talk) 13:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

I think it just upset me that no one looked at it before reverting it back.

One example,was for Prime Healthcare Services. My article had the link to the voice recording of it's CEO telling doctors how,to up-code.

Another article on Self Help said that groups were difficult to find. I was explaing how to find local community support groups, again where my article gave way more information on how-to than I could put in the Wiki article.

I would just ask that they be reviewed before being reverted.

Again, I was just trying to share my knowledge of the topics. I started with a subject that I knew, that all.