User talk:MichaelLockwood

Welcome!


Hello, MichaelLockwood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Serten (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621970862 your edit] to Maunder Minimum may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * and cold European winters has recently been made using the Central England Temperature record .{{cite journal |author= Lockwood, M. et al. |title= Are cold winters in

Koga cut crystals
Thanks, the omission of Koga's work has been a glaring hole for some time. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Issac Koga URSI medal and Portrait.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Issac Koga URSI medal and Portrait.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Apolgies - as I took the photograph of my Issac Koga medal (I won it in 1990), I thought it would be OK! I would thought that is a highly debatable rather than a blatant copyright infringement. It would be good if someone could add a photo of Issac Koga and the gold medal that is OK to use. MessageInABottle 20:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2022
Hi MichaelLockwood! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Magnetic reconnection that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks - my mistake. I think what happened was I made a change (that as you say was more than minor) that I then corrected a typo in and so only marked it a minor at that stage. Will watch out for that in future. I have made some more changes just now (which I have explained and not classed as minor) Mike - MessageInABottle 08:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, MichaelLockwood. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Mike Lockwood (physicist), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Victor Trevor ( talk ) 10:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Understood. It's just that the page was put up a few years back now and the publications count stated was out of date (it was then >300 and is now >400). I would never offer an opinion on a page I was conflicted on but I thought it would be OK to update a factual number that somebody else had put there. Nevertheless, I do get the point and next time I will point it out to another wikipedia editor and leave it up to them if they think it should be updated.

A barnstar for you!
thank you! Nice pages - I just did some tidying up.

License tagging for File:Dungey.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dungey.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

I think (hope) I have tagged this correctly for a cc-by-4 license. Please get back to me if this is not so.

New message
CoronalMassAffection (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Flux tube definition review request
Hello! We recently communicated on my talk page about frozen-in flux, and I was wondering if you could spare some time to take a look at the definition of a flux tube provided in. It currently has no citations, and I have been unable to find a source that gives a similar definition. Furthermore, the definition utilizes the "boundary" of a "closed, orientable surface", which does not make sense to me, as a closed surface by definition has no boundary. Perhaps I am misunderstanding something here. I would like to get your thoughts on this if you are able. Thanks. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I'll look at the page in a moment. But first thoughts: the surface the definition refers to is like a hollow tube and is closed in that it is a surface that wraps around on itself in the 2 spatial dimensions perpendicular to the tube axis to form the tube. The key point is that magnetic field does not thread the surface (so the tube funnels out - i.e. grows in cross sectional area if the field lines diverge and funnel together if the converge.  For me the key definition is that magnetic flux in a flux tube tube is conserved along the tube (which is a consequence of no field threading the tube surface and div(B) = 0): so $F = {\int}_A \vec{B}.\vec{da}$ is constant along a flux tube where $\vec{da}$ is an element of cross sectional area of the tube, $\vec{B}$ is the field in the tube, and the integral is over the cross sectional area of the tube, A.


 * (If B is uniform across the cross sectional area, this reduces to BA is constant).
 * Flux tubes can change in cross sectional area and can bend. However, when we add charged particles in a quasi-neutral magnetoplasma, the MHD force balance shows that there is a magnetic (Maxwell) pressure that acts perpendicular to B (of $B^2/(2{\mu}_o$) and a "tension" force that acts to straighten a bent flux tube. External pressures on the flux tube can stop it expanding in area and/or keep is bent but are needed to oppose the Maxwell pressure and the tension force. By the way, I dislike the universally used name "tension force" which comes from thinking of guitar strings that return to straight after plucking. The reason I don't like it is that the force of a bent flux tube vanishes once it is straight whereas the tension on a guitar string remains once it is straight. I always use the term "flux tube curvature force" - but I seem to be about the only one to worry about these semantics!
 * Because div(B) = 0, all flux tubes (if they have finite length) must, eventually, wrap itself around and its ends connect to form a torus (otherwise magnetic monopoles exist and they have never been definitively detected and if they do exist they are highly exotic for sure!). Hence the tube is either infinite in length or forms a closed torus (or magnetic monopoles do exist somewhere in the cosmos!)
 * Hope this helps. Needs a diagram really, but hopefully you can see what I am saying
 * Best regards MessageInABottle 11:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

OK - I have just looked at the page and it looks good to me. The definition part you point to is, however, very confusing. I would stress that, by definition, magnetic flux enters and leaves the tube only through its ends and not through its walls

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Professor Mike Cruise portrait 01.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Professor Mike Cruise portrait 01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 15:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The series of portraits was commissioned by IUG and STFC to be freely available - I just do not know for sure that they were given a CC-By licence, so did not feel I could click on that. I will contact the photographer (Max Alexander - he is a friend, and indeed I was one of the portraits in the series): and if they are not CC-By I will get his written permission to use this particular portrait of Mike Cruise on the RAS presidents website. If it has been removed by then, I will just upload it again. Thanks. 82.14.196.142 (talk) 18:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Professor Mike Cruise portrait 01.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Professor Mike Cruise portrait 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)