User talk:MichaelO'Dell

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Remote viewing has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Remote viewing was changed by MichaelO'Dell (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865531 on 2015-09-26T08:26:48+00:00.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, MichaelO&#39;Dell. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Rolling Thunder, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. ''Are you the same editor who has previously posted promotional material for Sidian Morningstar Jones? The additions you made, adding these new books to the top of every mention of books, were undue weight for new publications and gave the impression of being spammy. Please be aware of the issues here concerning COI, the appearance of it, and WP:SPAM concerns, whether or not there is a declared COI. Thanks. '' - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 20:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

No, I am not the same editor who has previously posted promotional material for Sidian Morningstar Jones. And, I have no compensatory relationship with anyone on Wikipedia or anyone about the edits which I made. I am also especially knowledgeable about the very simple edits I made, although a Wikipedia-blessed editor has willingly removed part of them. And no, I don't care even one bit to be involved in the overly-complex, unnecessarily political process of Wikipedia. Which will likely permanently remain why Wikipedia is an especially inaccurate source of accurate *or* incomplete information for virtually everything it publishes. Thus, I will continue to ignore the public requests of Wikipedia's founder for monetary support. Any and every self-serving on-line source which studiously declines facts, as does Wikipedia, deserves zero attention. And I know I can't be the only one who has noticed this. Edit this reply and Wikipedia however you like. As of this time, I will continue to ignore Wikipedia for the verification of reasonable information.