User talk:MichaelSteinman

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Anna rezan has been reverted. Your edit here to Anna rezan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/annarezankritseli/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Explanation: Many articles on wikipedia contained tones of external links with people's social media,I didn't and actually could not be aware of the fact that those are not welcome.

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna rezan


A tag has been placed on Anna rezan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Aerospeed  (Talk) 04:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Anna Rezan
Thank you for your contributions and work to improve Anna Rezan's page however, you removed the advert tag without giving any explanation. Please explain why you are removing the tag when the page reads like an advertisement. Meatsgains (talk) 02:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Then you (Meatsgains for your comments.I have been trying to understand your point. Comparing the article to articles of similar pages about people in similar fields,i could not find something in,that "reads like an advertisement".Every phrase written came thought out interviews that are citated below the article.An ad would be to mention someone as beautiful instead of a model(profession).Or to name some successful or even talented.The fact that their film was a success is not advertising.Thank you.

The tag refers the page's current promotional tone. Below are a few examples: All the promotional language needs to be trimmed from the page for the tag to be resolved and removed. Hope this helps clear things up a bit. Meatsgains (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Her debut song "Let there be rain"...
 * ...and made her catwalk debut as a high fashion model in New York Fashion Week in 2013.
 * ...by the Greek veteran director Nikos Perakis.
 * Her noteworthy appearance of the year though...
 * ...in Fokion Bogris gangster feature film Katharsi
 * ...an organization that is dedicated in ending the stigma of addictions

Sockpuppet investigation
FuriouslySerene (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)