User talk:Michael Glenwood

Welcome!
Hello, Michael Glenwood, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nick Ensign, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dogsix (talk) 00:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Ensign


A tag has been placed on Nick Ensign requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 00:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Beatrix of the Netherlands has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Beatrix of the Netherlands was changed by Michael Glenwood (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918237 on 2017-01-04T21:22:16+00:00.

Proposed deletion of Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church


The article Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church, Michael Glenwood!

Wikipedia editor PamD just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hallo Michael, I've tidied the article up somewhat but please add references from independent published sources which discuss the church. Thanks."

To reply, leave a comment on PamD's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Pam D  12:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Ochs


A tag has been placed on Brian Ochs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 172.58.41.13 (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Oaks


A tag has been placed on Brian Oaks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 172.58.41.13 (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Brian Ochs. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 172.58.41.13 (talk) 05:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 05:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Saint Rose de Viterbo Catholic Church. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 07:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Michael, please note that the text displayed in the AfD template says "this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed". I've spotted that the text you see when you edit says "Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled", which is perhaps open to misinterpretation. I've raised that point at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion. Pam  D  09:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You know,, a WP:WDAFD would be convenient, not to say appropriate...? O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  09:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Quite so. And/or reporting the AfD nominator to ANI. Absurd nomination. Pam  D  09:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Michael: see also User_talk:Cyberpower678; I think there's scope for improvement there too. Sorry you're having a bad time over this article. Please stay with us, and find and add some good reliable independent sources about the church to ensure the future of the article. You can also, of course, comment in the AfD discussion. Pam  D  09:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)