User talk:Michael Starseed

Proposed deletion of 3 Magic Words


The article 3 Magic Words has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable film, lacks reliable references fails WP:NFILMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Jay Jay What did I do? 23:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

3 Magic Words
Hello. Edits such as this one and your status as a single purpose account strongly suggest that you either are Michael Perlin, or are closely associated with him. If that's the case, I advise you to carefully read over Wikipedia's guidelines for editors with a conflict of interest. That guide can be found here: Conflict of interest. If you are not Perlin or associated with him, I apologize, but you should also familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies on Close paraphrasing, since your recent edits are directly taken from their supporting sources. In the future, please contribute neutrally, in you own words. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 3 Magic Words for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3 Magic Words is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/3 Magic Words until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 3 Magic Words. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SL93 (talk) 19:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Dolores Cannon
Hello again. I've removed your comments from Articles for deletion/Dolores Cannon. If you would like to review your removed comments, you can see them in the page's history. That discussion was closed in 2013, and that isn't the proper venue to change anything. As the notice across the top of the page says: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Information about deletion review can be found here: Deletion review. I strongly recommend that you carefully familiarizing yourself with that page and Notability (people) before attempting this, however. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)