User talk:Michaelas10/Archive/Archive 01

Hey
Shalom, Michael. I read your article, with its edit summary of "Lots of mistakes made. Oh this program is mine btw", and, unfortunately, I have to tell you about your biggest mistake:

creating an article on your own personal pet project.

We strive for objectivity here, and for something that you're involved in so closely, you can't help but be subjective.

Your program, although I'm sure it's very well-made, does not meet our standards of notability - would someone else ever create an article about Error Maker Plus, even if they didn't know you personally?

Your article has been deleted, as has the image associated with it. I'm sorry. DS 21:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, agreed.


 * Michaelas10 13:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Electrical NIT raipur
Regarding Electrical NIT raipur, feel free to add the proposed speedy delete tags yourself: WP:CSD. --mtz206 (talk) 12:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, I will.


 * Michaelas10 13:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

CSD
Please take the time to familiarize yourself with the speedy deletion policies before placing tags. These tags are meant for very specific situations. Further, your edit summary here is not correct:. These tags should not be removed if the person adds more information. They should follow the instructions on the tag if they want to dispute the speedy deletion.--mtz206 (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

As a courtesy for other editors, kindly observe Wikipedia guidelines and sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. For further info see: Talk page guidelines. Thanks. --mtz206 (talk) 12:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Mmm.. I see. Thanks for helping me.


 * Michaelas10 13:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Mayukh Bose
I'm not too fussed about it, but I'm curious why you changed my empty tag to a vandalism one.

The empty seems more appropriate.

--Dweller 11:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I wasn't sure about the tag either but I decided that this tag should be put instead and the article is just a test of a new user and I reffered him to the sendbox in the discussion page. If there would be a test tag I would put that instead the vandalism.


 * Michaelas10 11:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry to be thick, but I don't understand! --Dweller 11:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The article is a test and that user, who's new in wikipedia, needed to be reffered to the sandbox so I reffered him. About the tag, if there was a tag that the article should be removed because it was a test, I would put it, but there wasn't a one so I put a vandalism tag.


 * Michaelas10 11:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! I see you've been helping figh vandals. That's great, but in the future, please put the  tag on users' talk pages, not article talk pages. Thanks! User:Angr 11:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh and regarding the Mayukh Bose "article", it was clearly "intended to disparage its subject", which means the appropriate tag is neither "empty" nor "vandalism" but db-attack. User:Angr 11:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * not that it really matters now (!) but at the time, the only word in the article was "hello". --Dweller 11:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. Anyway, there is a test tag too; it's db-test. User:Angr 13:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks I didn't know that.
 * Michaelas10 15:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Vadgam and patent nonsense
Hi there. I noticed you nominated Vadgam for speedy deletion as "patent nonsense". Can you please review the requirements for WP:CSD G eneral 1? That term is defined very narrowly, and it did not fit this article at all. (Actually, it was a poorly written article on a real village, which I was able to clean up in 5 minutes.) -- SCZenz 07:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * When I first put the nonsense tag on the article, the article was a half line long. Then, I noticed the author removed the nonsense tag and added more not understandable information, it did fit more to the nonsense catagory.


 * Michaelas10 07:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * When the article was short, it was in fact a good (and expandable) sub-stub: it said "vadgam is situated in Banaskantha district in north gujarat", which is exactly equivalent to "Upton is situated on Long Island in eastern New York." As for the longer form or the article, here are some additional comprehensible facts that do not even require region-specific vocabuluary:
 * "The population of the village around 8000."
 * "The main business of the people is Agriculture and Dairy Husbandary."
 * The article was likely written by a non-native speaker of English who is not familiar with the writing style on Wikipedia, and was thus difficult to read; this does not make it patent nonsense. From the definition of patent nonsense:
 * Patent nonsense, i.e. no meaningful content, unsalvageably incoherent page. This does not include: poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, badly translated material, implausible theories or hoaxes.
 * There is an entire page on patent nonsense, actually, at Patent nonsense, that further clarifies what patent nonsense is not. Let me know if you have any further questions. -- SCZenz 08:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Introducing myself...
Shalom, Michael! I'm Deborah Jay, also in Israel but four decades your senior... and I hope you won't mind if I write in my native English, for speed's sake. I'm a professional translator (Hebrew to English) and editor, and started working on Wikipedia quite recently, on May 12, 2006. I think it's great and I believe everyone should contribute here, so I want to encourage you :-)

I was asked to take a look at the Mofet article you started, so have written about that on its Discussion page. (As I hadn't yet read your bio when I wrote my comments, I didn't know this is only your second article -- so I hope you didn't find my suggestions too harsh! They're meant as suggested guidelines.) Meanwhile, just wanted to introduce myself, and invite you to feel free to take a look at my User page (that also links to my User page in Hebrew) and write to me on my Talk page ad lib if you have any questions or comments. -- Best regards, Deborahjay 15:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Shalom, Deborah, thanks alot of editing my article and pointing out the mistakes. See what I wrote you on its Discussion page.


 * Michaelas10 15:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Stewart v. Abend is NOT a copyright violation
Michaelas10, you incorrectly tagged Stewart v. Abend as a copyright violation.

The text posted on that page is a verbatim copy of the United States Supreme Court decision. As a matter of copyright and United States law, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are in the public domain and cannot be copyrighted. They are not copyrightable and no one can assert copyright over them. The page you referenced cannot assert copyright over public domain material. It is the content which is ruling, not the inclusion of a copyright notice.

With that said, an article should be written about the case on the Stewart v. Abend page. The text of the case shouldn't be slapped up there, as it can be found on the Supreme Court's own webpage, amongst hundreds of other webpages.207.69.137.41 07:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Michaelas, don't worry too much about the stern warning above. Everybody makes mistakes, and I've made worse ones. There's a stub there now, so you're welcome to fix it up, though I should get to it in a few days if no one else does.--Kchase02 T 08:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I wrote the 207.69.137.41 material which appears above. I didn't see it as a "stern warning." People are too quick to slap a "copyright violation" on articles here and don't understand the fundamentals of copyvio. (And, apparently, Kchase02 has never been to law school -- if you think I was "stern," my friend, I have experienced a much sterner form of sternness than you.) I wasn't jumping down Michaelas10's throat, but everyone should be more careful about the copyvio listing. It's like pulling a fire alarm. Understand what it's about before you use it. Cheers207.69.138.10 23:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * 207......, if you know so much about the copyright tags you should register a WP username.--Kchase02 T 23:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, I do have a Wiki account, but I'm not at home and don't have my password.207.69.138.10 00:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * When you get home, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks.--Kchase02 T 00:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Michaelas, I read your talk page and saw that a lot of the messages have been bits from other wikipedians telling you what not to do and you responding courteously and reasonably. You seem like a fine chap. Do let me know if you want some help with anything on WP, need to vent, want advice, or are just looking for a friendly ear. I'd be glad to do whatever I can.

Cheers and happy editing!--Kchase02 T 09:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot but I already got a welcome greeting..


 * Michaelas10 10:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * May I add a comment (as one of the abovementioned "other Wikipedians") -- we too, in our way, are being no less courteous and reasonable here, and attempting to provide guidance and help rather than continuing to edit without discussion. :-) -- Deborahjay 11:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry if my comment came across as rude. Thanks for the check Deborahjay. It's good for me.--Kchase02 T 18:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Hakfar Hayarok
Yes, it is Israel related, but this is not an issue limited to Israel. In fact, I sort every school by both being a school and by the country where it is located. First, the school-stub category splits by geography. Double-stubbing with both the country name and the school tag allows this to be done more easily. Second, this is not an issue limited to schools, or to any particular stub type. If I found, for example, a professor of philosophy who was from a country which did not have its own type of bio-stub, I would sort them as both philosopher-stub and and country-stub. It doesn't matter if the country is not the most relevant piece of information - what matters is providing as many ways to access or approach information as possible. Perhaps someone is looking for schools; perhaps someone is looking for more information about Israel and looks for your youth village under that category. So that it can be found either way, it must take both stubs. Aelfthrytha 15:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Mmm.. So basicly the most of the articles in Wikipedia to should be added to a category of some country. For instance, if the article is about a person that lives in USA, so the article is a USA releated article. It shouldn't be like that. Also, if a person is looking for information on Israel, who should view the Israeli history/government/economy/etc.. articles instead of looking in an article about a school in Israel, it wouldn't help him at all.


 * Michaelas10 17:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Several remarks to the above:
 * The stub by geography has been well supported by Aelfthrytha's discussion, and I've reverted the edit that removed it.
 * Many categories do exist that include USA (or other English-speaking countries) for use in this (i.e. English-language) Wikipedia; this helps the user navigate the information by multiple access paths.
 * It's a tenet of Wikipedia that subsequent editors will modify and improve an article, and only delete what's erroneous or harms it (see below).
 * If there's a Wikipedia practice to which you object, there are mechanisms for questioning, challenging, and suggesting revisions to it.


 * Michaelas10, your editing practices reveal some gaps in your understanding of how Wikipedia functions, and other editors are going to some lengths to provide you with extensive after-the-fact assistance in appropriate editing. Besides studying these, it's well to refrain from deleting information unless you know it to be erroneous, in which case note this in your edit summary and preferably in the article's discussion page as well. The practice I recommend: prior to deleting, query the other editor as to the reason for the change to which you object.


 * About Wikipedia editing as a joint effort, may I observe: your imposing limitations based on second-guessing the future reader's motives and how they'll access information, fails to take into account that Wikipedia is a highly developed, participatory tool for info storage and retrieval. As good faith is one of the cardinal rules here, give your (legion) fellow editors credit for their experience and insights, and see what you can learn from their practices.-- Hope that helps, Deborahjay 00:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Yet I don't agree with the fact that it's Israel geography releated, I removed it and put Israel releated instead.
 * Michaelas10 14:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If you object, you really should put something on the talk page of the article instead of just modifying it. Please be careful - you could violate the three revert rule and be temporarily blocked.Aelfthrytha 04:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Removal of stub templates
Please do not continually remove valid stub templates from articles. Stub templates are added to help editors to find articles on subjects that they are likely to be able to edit. Doing so is vandalism, and may see you being blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Stubs about items relating to a particular country are stubbed with templates relating to that country, so that editors who know that country can edit them. For example, stubs relating to schools in Israel are marked with both school-stub and israel-stub, since people who expand school articles will want to know where they are, and also editors who know about or live in Israel will be better able to find the articles. For this reason we have country-specific templates for a wide number of countries, both in the form country-stub (e.g., Spain-stub) for general items relating to the country and country-geo-stub (e.g., Malaysia-geo-stub) for geographical locations within a country - including school dormitory villages. Grutness...wha?  01:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I see.. I removed that stub because it seemed unneeded to me, I was going to put it back when I would be proven wrong.


 * Michaelas10 08:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hakfar Hayarok is an Israel-geo-stub. It's a place - albeit a youth village - and it's in Israel. The nature of the place is irrelevant (see my comment above about school dormitory villages). Grutness...wha?  23:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, agreed.


 * Michaelas10 08:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Just for the record, it wasn't a 3RR violetion; I've made two revert in July 1, 2006 and 1 another in July 4, 2006. Michaelas10 12:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Village Pump
If you actually care about that youth stuff, you should post on the village pump.

Architect1 12:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I did and people supported it. I am currently in proccess of writing it with lcarsdata. Thanks for the interest.


 * Michaelas10 14:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

edits
hey I just want to say before you make anymore edits check what your doing first, instead of reediting what you already edited like on Big Business (album)  Bazel 08:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah I forgot to use the preview button there.. I hope I don't have editcountitis.


 * Michaelas10 08:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Double Standard?
Re: Wikipedia Youth Foundation - so we have an article about a group that does not exist - yet. Normally, that would get a speedy tag and deleted within minutes. Does the fact that this is an internal project somehow make this article an exception? As I would say to any author writing about a non-existant group - get known first - and then add an article to Wikipedia. Rklawton 17:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * This is the intire point of the foundation - we want people to realise that there are children in Wikipedia. Also what do you mean a non-existing group? Will it exist after people will participate?
 * Michaelas10 18:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Great, and I would like to start a group tomorrow promoting world peace. Can I write an article about it for Wikipedia today?  No.  Notability first - then an article.  Rklawton 18:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * They exist. Me and Lcarsdata for instance. I just simply can't get the userbox automaticly add the user to the category, can anyone help me out with that?


 * Michaelas10 18:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Nah I put it on the the main namespace instead of the project namespace so I could move it there after so the whole thing is a misundestanding.


 * Michaelas10 19:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Your youth foundation thing
Good luck with the idea...I'd start going through the userpages, looking for people's ages. You could also check out Esperanza. I'm not sure if it's such a good idea, though....... The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 01:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * What do you mean looking for people's ages? We can't force them to join..


 * Michaelas10 07:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Google toolbar
Just wanted to let you know that Google toolbar (for internet explorer and Firefox) has a built in spellchecker. Cheers. --mboverload @ 09:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't need it, I don't make spelling mistakes in what I write if I check it first myself, I made only 2 minor mistakes in the Ambush marketing article and I'm aware of them both. A grammer checker maybe?


 * Michaelas10 09:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

"Vandalism"
Uhm... That was not vandalism on my user page, I had edited it myself on a different IP address. Did it look like vandalism to you? Please, rather bring up the issue on one's talk page, not just automatically revert back to the previous page. It is very frustrating. Nich 19:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Silvernich


 * Mmm.. Sorry about that just that the same IP did vandalism earlier (reverted by Deepujoseph) and what was writen sounded writen in a bad tone for me. I tried to revert it back but you did it first.


 * Michaelas10 19:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * No worries, I understand completely. =]
 * Nich 19:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Silvernich
 * (Furthermore, you seem a quite intelligent 13-year-old. Thank you for being another youth that likes using his brain. Of course, the Wiki isn't the only way to show your intelligence, but I think you'll get my point.)


 * Thanks.
 * Michaelas10 13:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Unique
Hi. My name is Lindsay. You may call me Lin. I would like to know if there are any youth clubs on Wikipedia, because I am eleven years old and most of the Wikipedians are older. I consider myself unique. Please reply. Thank you. $$$=Lindsay1980 19:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Good! I am joining! I can't stumble upon too many young Wikipedians! Thank you! $$$=Lindsay1980 19:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Another thing about me being unique: I don't have an e-mail or msn! It's pretty bad. I can still talk to you on here. $$$=Lindsay1980 19:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * More uniqueness, I cannot download or have an e-mail until I am 13! I'm sorry. $$$=Lindsay1980 19:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I know. But now kids are more into technology than ever, and parents are enabling own e-mailing accounts to the kids. I consider myself unique more involved with fitness, nature and excercise rather than computers and television. That's why I consider myself unique. And I get A+ each report card I get (once I had a B+ but no less than that.) $$$=Lindsay1980 00:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Your revert
Links to Webmaster Resources owned by Game Site ARE NOT spamming. They are owned by that website and have relevance to the wikipedia article. By the way thanks for starting the trend of making wikipages for these sites, keep it up (here are a few that need doing: FlashGames247.com, FunFlashGames.com, AGame.com, 2DPlay.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.207.232 (talk • contribs)


 * Even if not spam, that link was unnecessary (such linking to the forums) and it would not help the user that read the article. Instead, information about the Webmaster Resources should've been added to the main article.


 * As for the sites, I will make articles only about sites that sponsor their games. -- Michaelas10 19:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Michaelas10! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. - GI e n 18:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
thanks for the help.I never understood how too correctly sign my name. SOADLuver 00:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. -- Michaelas10 08:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey Micheal, you said thanks to me in my talk page may I ask you what did i do for you for which you gave me this gracious compliment HussainAbbas02:20, 20 August 2006 (PST)


 * You said you love everybody. Michaelas10 09:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Need Help
sorry to bother you but would you know how I could see how many times I've contributed to wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SOADLuver (talk • contribs)


 * Yes, please see WikiProject edit counters. Michaelas10 20:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

A Question
Dear Michael On the 13th of August you scribbled the following text in my talk page [quote] Yeah, thanks. [/quote]

I dont remember doing any favour to you  so may i ask  you  why did you made such a flattering (and sweet) remark to me ....and for what ??

thankyou

PS. Please reply back in my talk page

Hussain 20:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, I've already replied, see above. Also, if you want to see when I'll answer you in this talk page, use the watch and the watchlist features. Michaelas10 21:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Bonjour
Bonjour! Sorry for the French, but I seem to get off to a better start in Englishwhen I start a sentence in French. I just wanted to say hi because you're a teen like me! I am 15 but I am not that big for my age. Come see my userpage (although I think lots of stuff I broke the rules in (so don't touch anything)) Hello! Yay! I remembered to put two L's this time! --Sylvia 19:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oui, I will! How do I join? I was thinking of a WikiTeasers, where you get all sorts of fun and educationinalyzing things for kids! --Sylvia &amp;#9829; 21:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I will, but I still don't see what it will benefit for myself, so it's worth a try to learn. --Sylvia 23:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

new articles
I saw your two latest articles. Would you be able to post them (and other Israel-related articles you've created) on Portal:Israel/New so that others can know about your contributions? Thanks. --Shuki 20:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Will do. Michaelas10 18:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

VistA
The VA's VistA has been in use for decades. It is already deployed at tens of thousands of sites and actively used by millions of medical staff world wide. It is the product commonly refered to by the name Vista.

MS Vista is not in use. It is en alpha stage with features coming and going, mostly going and has not reached even beta (where feature list is stable, but need to be verified/polished). It will be quite some time before it is deployed by even one person.

C'mon. At a time like this when an increasing number of (US) veterans and (US) dept. of defense employees (aka soldiers) are in increasing need of healthcare, a high-speed/low-drag system like VistA needs to be brought to the forefront. And especially since health care initiatives worldwide and looking around for technology they can use, Vista has a lot of potential to grow beyond its already enormous base. -- Minion o&#39; Bill 07:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Windows Vista didn't only reach beta, it reached the RC stage about 11 days ago, and it will be released RTM very soon so a lot of people probably search for it at the moment. I don't want to start an argument about who's more important, but just keep that in mind. Michaelas10 14:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments
Hello,

I am responding to your question about the Google Co-op page edits that I made.

There are in fact two kinds of Co-op services.

1. One of these (called Google Topics) allows a subject matter expert to label third party web sites. So for example, I could decide that I wanted to create a set of labels for all the wine sites on the web. I would be representing myself as an expert on wine, and users would subscribe to my label file to see my labels. For example, if you are logged into any Google account (e.g. a gmail account) and you search on "Cancer", you get the following appearing above the organic search results:

Refine results for cancer: Treatment	 	Tests/diagnosis	 	For patients	 	From medical authorities Symptoms	 	Causes/risk factors	 	For health professionals	 	Alternative medicine

All of the keywords (labels) listed are hyperlinks to search results that are modifed by some subject matter experts label file that was created for Cancer. Note that this example is one of the very few label files that Google provides to all users, regardless of whether or not you signed up for it. Most label files require you to sign up.

2. Google Subscribed links is a distinct and different program. This is where a web site owner creates a feed out of their site. The feed file would respond to specific search "triggers" related to your site, and once again provide some information that relates to the query above the organic search results. But this response is different than the Google Topics response. It looks more like this:

About Havelock, North Carolina Pop: 22,442. 225 miles E of Charlotte. Area Code: 252. Leans Republican. Many young kids. Easy commutes. Large families. Many married. Diverse. Low property crime. More: schools, libraries, diversity, lat/lon, etc., edit | remove www.citytowninfo.com/places/north-carolina/havelock

This response is for the CityTownInfo (CTI) subscribed links file in response to the query "about Havelock, NC". Here you see that factual data is now presented in the search engine response to the user query. Site owners may choose to do this because it helps turn site visitors into repeat visitors by putting your site at the top of the results for related queries. Users do it to ensure that they get the information they are looking for from trusted sources.

Summary: So you can see that they are both quite different in structure. I think more needs to be said on the Google Co-Op page. I would like to make the edits, however, I am a Wikipedia newbie. Can you give me sone guidance as to how to proceed so what I do fits best with the needs of Wikipedia? I am happy to put together a more detailed piece that tries to clearly expose the differences between these 2 aspects of the Co-op program. Let me know.

Thanks!

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Slowhand32 (talk • contribs)


 * I've answered on your talk page. -- Michaelas10 13:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

I see the edits you made to add the description of Google Health. The Google Co-Op page is still missing a description of the Subscribed links portion of the program. It is very different as I described above, and, in my opinion, the more interesting part of the program for web site operators who want to use Google Co-Op to promote their sites. If you would like clarification, please let me know.

While I know I can go in and make edits, I wanted to discuss this with you before I did to make sure you agree that it makes sense to spell that part of the program out in more detail. After all, I am new here, and I want to make sure I am doing the right things.

Slowhand32 17:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Done 10 days ago. Michaelas10 18:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Google Calculator
Re: Merge?

Hi. Yes, the reason I didn't merge it was because it doesn't really belong on its own. It's one of many web search features, found within Google search. i couldnt have just writeen about calculator and not the others. I suggest starting a new heading called "Search features" under the "search engine" heading. --Mambo Jambo 23:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Will do. Michaelas10 17:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Bruno Landsberg
It isn't not productive to create a page for an item, person, place, and have it merely redirect to another article that is about something different: person not= company. By leaving the link a 'redlink' it advertises that it is an article waiting to be created. I think that showing it to exist is detrimental to WP. Could you get it deleted? Simply blank the page. Thanks. --Shuki 23:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I've seen redirecting a founder to his company done many times befaure. If that article will get created, it will most likely be against the notability guidelines. I've change the link to bold text, such as done with Tom Fulp. Michaelas10 06:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Strauss-Elite [sic]
Michael, shalom -- I won't take the time to review the entire Hebrew>English text, so here's what I suggest: Other actions I've performed: H>E translation notes, FYI: Hope that helps, Deborahjay 10:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Review the copyediting I've done and see if the problem's resolved. If not:
 * Put a comment on my User Talk page in which you paste the particular problematic sentences.
 * Page name: I've moved the page to the present (hyphenated) name per the English-language main page of the Elite website. Hope that's correct for the merger -- the Strauss website in Hebrew notes that a webpage for the merged company is "coming soon." (Also a Google search on "StraussElite" leades to the website _www.strauss-elite.co.il_, also with the hyphenated form of the name.)
 * Interwiki: I logged on to the Hebrew Wikipedia and added the :en: interwiki link to the Hebrew page.
 * Copyediting follow-up: I've marked the English page for my watchlist, and will copyedit new material ad lib (though won't expand due to other current editing priorities).
 * A company is a "monopoly" -- the legislation defining this is an "act."
 * A "dairy barn" (*רפת*) is where cows are housed, also where milking is done if this is not in a separate "milking parlor." An enterprise for the production and marketing of milk and dairy products is a "dairy" -- whether or not the proper Hebrew word *מחלבה* is used in the source text.

RE: Hot (Israel)
Hi, Not sure what you are talking about, what name did I shorten and I did not see anything about what you wrote?? I am simply going through TV channel articles and adding in logos (if they are missing) and correcting the URL's. Are you referring to me changing it to 'Official Site'? I have done this to hundreds of articles, I think it looks better, makes them more consistent.HeMan5 17:45, 21 September 2006

NLSIU
Hello. I saw you edits here. I think that User:Brothers in Arms is doing a good job removing WP:POV additions to the encyclopedia. Please do not make changes to articles which do not conform to WP:NPOV policy of wikipedia. Also keep in mind the three revert rule. Please discuss on the talk page of the articles before making major changes and remember Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Regards, &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick  {L} 10:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Hmm.. I asked him to discuss the changes if he insists that it should be removed. Instead, he removed it again without discussion and asked me to discuss the changes. Besides, he removed a complete paragraph which was perfectly encyclopedic. I've posted a note about this on the article's talk page. Michaelas10 16:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)