User talk:Michaelbondiicj

International in-house counsel journal
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of International in-house counsel journal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.iicj.net/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International in-house counsel journal
A tag has been placed on International in-house counsel journal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 16:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

iicj survey
International In-house Counsel Journal

Each year the IICJ undertakes a survey of in-house counsel selected from it’s data base of over 40,000 in-house counsel worldwide. The respondents typically represent in-house legal teams from companies operating in over 60 countries world wide Profile of Participating Companies Combined annual revenues of over $500 billion Participants representing over 3000 in house lawyers in over 60 countries worldwide Legal spend annually estimated at over $1bn Legal teams ranging from 1-5 lawyers up to 250+ lawyers Under who has been surveyed point 6 to add - The indicative amount of legal fee spend annually of the respondents based upon their replies is likely to be well in excess of $1bn The indicative number of law firms used by the respondents' would be close to 1000 worldwide.

November 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with International in-house counsel journal. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Solicitors Journal, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Solicitors Journal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Solicitors Journal, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Solicitors Journal. Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)