User talk:Michaelchan1998/Evaluate an Article

Michaelchan1998 your review is complete, but it is very vague and lacks detail. Yes, it was finished, but the quality could be improved by answering the questions with specific examples in detail - so not just answering every question with 'yes' or 'no', but providing reasons for those answers. In doing do, you would actually do some of the legwork for improving your article because you would have created a strong template of areas to improve. Without that extra effort, I'm not sure what needs work and what doesn't (besides the topic being biased towards the Romans, which is definitely true). In the future if you need help with these exercises please come see me or your tutor well before they are due. Grade: 7/10, late submission -2: 5/10. Gardneca (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)