User talk:Michaelgav09

Welcome!
Hello, Michaelgav09, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Meow. Welcome aboard.

Dr Aaij (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 

Casino Pier
That edit improves the article--but I can hardly give you full credit for the "Add to an article" assignment, since it's such a minor edit. Adding some reliable sources (surely there are books and newspaper articles) would help if you want credit. And that still leaves the Copyedit and the Critique assignments, which is why right now you have a failing grade. If you want credit for those assignments, even if they are late, it has to be done this week. Dr Aaij (talk) 03:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The Cracker Barrel critique was also a bit underwhelming, and two weeks (?) late. I'm surprised you didn't know about those court cases. Dr Aaij (talk) 05:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Sandbox
Please put the actual draft of the article you're working on in an appropriately titled sandbox, as we discussed in class. Thanks. Dr Aaij (talk) 02:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Dr Aaij (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Michaelgav--in 20 days you have managed to exactly this. You may think that this is the easiest class you ever taken, with the least amount of work, but if you keep going like this you won't pass.Dr Aaij (talk) 02:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battleview orchards


The article Battleview orchards has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable property

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Moved article
I've moved the article to your userspace at User:Michaelgav09/Battleview orchards so you can work on improving the article, as it was at risk of deletion.

The article lacks sourcing to show how the farmlands are notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. Be cautious, as farmlands are not automatically notable despite their age. You may want to see if there has been any sort of academic coverage of the farm, as this is one of the easier ways to establish notability since academic sourcing is almost always considered to be a reliable source on Wikipedia. News coverage would be good too, as long as it is in-depth, non-primary, and is not a routine notification of an event (ie, something that just gives the dates and times of something that will occur). Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * , if I remember correctly you are the local New Jersey expert. Michaelgav's assignment is to write up an article using published books (besides other material) as references. Now, I think you probably got New Jersey pretty well covered--but do you have any recommendations, any topics/buildings/people/places/churches/etc. that you know are notable and that you know allow for better sourcing than, say, New Jersey Folklore Society? Your help is greatly appreciated--the student is in a bit of a difficult situation and needs to get the show on the road quickly. Michaelgav, as I said before, formatting etc. is not problematic: it can be fixed. We need content, and we need good sources. Thanks, Alansohn, for whatever you can do. Dr Aaij (talk) 21:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Inline citations
Hi, I've been doing some looking, and I have found a problem common to all of your articles. You have sources, which you cite at the end of the article. That much is good, but you use no footnotes. If you have cited, for instance, 3 works for your article, it is impossible for the reader to tell which facts are supposed to come from which sources. Take a look at MOS:REF and WP:IC, and try to add some inline references to your articles. If you need help, let me know. Lady of  Shalott  02:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Points
I am going through your contributions as good as I can--but I don't see where you ever proposed a DYK hook (the hook alone would be worth 75 points for the DYK Week exercise) or where you responded to peer review. For New Jersey Folklore Society, for instance, you received abundant advice on the talk page on 11 April, yet you didn't make any meaningful edits to the article since then. For Custer wolf I see a few edits that seem to have been prompted by my comment on the talk page, but these edits are relatively minor and you have not done anything to alleviate the problems signaled by the tags, and those are serious problems. So I can give you a bit of credit for "Response to peer review", but not much since, well, there hasn't been much. Dr Aaij (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

I moved on from the New Jersey Folklore Society as per your instructions since you told me when I was in class "there's nothing else you can do with it i'd choose a new topic". and I never returned to the article on the WWII ace since you also told me I didn't have enough reliable sources. At this point, based on our emails, I have done everything that you have instructed me to do. I am now home in New Jersey seeking medical treatment and would appreciate any final advice and guidance on Custer Wolf. I will work on the hook today.
 * That is not what I said. Besides, even if you are assigned a different topic, one which meets the guidelines by having books as sources, that doesn't mean you have to drop the fighter ace in mid-air. I am sorry you are not here, and I hope you are getting better, but with the wolf also, this has taken very long, and the semester is over--we could have started on the wolf three or four weeks ago. I'm about to look at the article. Dr Aaij (talk) 21:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Custer Wolf
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)