User talk:Michaelmonet44

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Brewer (November 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CaptainEek were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barry Brewer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barry Brewer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Barry_Brewer Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CaptainEek&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Barry_Brewer reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Declare any connection
Hello Michaelmonet44. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Barry Brewer, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Michaelmonet44. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)


 * WorldBruce,


 * Thank you for your review. I am writing to state that I am in no way a paid advocate and I am not receiving any form of compensation for this article, directly or indirectly. It is not clear to me what edits led to that conclusion, but my recent edits were all made to accommodate the suggestions of the last member who reviewed the original submission back in November, Captain Eek. Please let me know if there is any further information I need to provide or additional edits I need to make in order to have this article approved.


 * Thank you,
 * MichaelMonet44
 * Michaelmonet44 (talk) 03:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your statement. I've left a comment on the draft. If the sources in the draft are the best available, then I doubt there is anything you can do to get the draft accepted, other than wait until more is written about Brewer in independent sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Barry Brewer has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Barry Brewer. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 01:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Barry Brewer
Hello, Michaelmonet44. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Barry Brewer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Barry Brewer


Hello, Michaelmonet44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Barry Brewer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)