User talk:Michaelpoa

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Michaelpoa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sara Duterte, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 10:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Chlod,
 * I am the Spokesperson of the Vice President. All changes made were factual and were only for the purpose of making the article accurate. There is no promotion of anything whatsoever. May I respectfully request that the changes made be maintained.
 * T Michaelpoa (talk) 10:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Michaelpoa: Your conflict of interest means you should not make further edits to the article, as we cannot ensure neutrality. Attempting to remove sourced content, or adding in unnecessary details, factual or not, is disallowed as this skews the due weight given to the article subject. This includes most of your edits on the Sara Duterte article. File edit requests instead, and do not make further edits without editorial oversight.
 * Furthermore, making paid edits on Wikipedia is against the Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use and is grounds for a block. Please view the related page on paid contribution disclosure for more information about proper disclosure. Chlod (say hi!) 11:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Sara Duterte, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sara Duterte. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * That is public information that is freely available online. Perhaps you should have it removed from those sources? You have a wp:conflict of interest and should not be editing the Sara Duterte article. Adakiko (talk) 11:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sara Duterte, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 03:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Kindly explain how this is disruptive? Kindly provide an explanation how this is vandalism? The additional information is supported by facts. The reason why articles are editable is so that contributors may correct misleading information provided.

Reverting edits without proper context, and ambiguously tagging my edits as disruptive is obviously pushing for a particular narrative on your part without a scintilla of legal basis whatsoever.

Michaelpoa (talk) 05:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Michaelpoa: I've already explained in detail above why your edits are disruptive. If you'd like more context, your most egregious edit shows a severe lack of knowledge for Wikipedia's editorial style, little to no citations to reliable sources, and an obvious attempt at removal of sourced content; all of which are against Wikipedia's core policies and guidelines. You've stated some content is miselading, yet provided nothing to prove so. It's particularly distasteful that you're accusing an experienced editor and vandalism patroller for "pushing a particular narrative" when the content you've added itself skews the article to remove content which itself is supported by numerous sources in the name of satisfying your client.
 * This is not a government press release; you do not get to dictate the contents of an article, and you most certainly cannot change the article to a point where its content speaks a promotional tone. Chlod (say hi!) 07:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Please use an edit request
As you have a conflict of interest, please use an wp:edit request. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)