User talk:Michaelpowerfullwings

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1990 Southwark London Borough Council election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Writing in ALL CAPS is not permitted. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

EDITING THE ARTICLE "1990 SOUTHWARK...." WAS AN INVITATION BY WIKIPEDIA ITSELF THAT ALLOWED THE USER TO START EDITING AND PUBLISHING. IT WAS GIVEN BY YOUR APPROVAL AT FIRST. WITHOUT A PERMISSION IN THE SITE, IT WON'T BE POSSIBLE TO PUBLISH ANY EDITING. FOR EDITING OR SHARING OPINIONS, IT IS A MUST TO RESTRICT THE EDITING BY WIKIPEDIA ITSELF. WHICH IT WAS UNCLEAR AND UNCERTAIN ABOUT NOT REVIEWING THE ARTICLE BEFORE PUBLISHING. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW TO ALLOW EDITING AND RESTRICTING IT AFTERWARDS. I AM ASKING FOR MY RIGHTS OF GIVING YOU A FREE OPINION THAT YOU KEPT SECRETLY AND PROHIBITED PUBLISHING IT AFTER ASKING ME TO WRITE IT. THIS POLICIES AND REGULATIONS MANIPULATIONS AREE BREAKINV THE LAW OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH THAT YOUR SITE PRETENDED TO PRACTICE. THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS LONG AS YOU INVITED ME TO PARTICIPATE IN EDITING IN FIRST PLACE. Michaelpowerfullwings (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

GREETINGS, IT IS AN UNCLEAR POLICY THAT LED TO THE CONCLUSION OF DISRUPTIVE. IF THE ARTICLE EDITED BY ME IN MY ACCOUNT AND TO MY SAVINGS IS DISRUPTIVE TO WIKIPEDIA WHY AM I GIVEN THE PRIVILEGE TO EDIT THE ARTICLE? IT MIGHT BE RESTRICTED OR FOR LIMITED USAGE ONLY. I EDITED THE ARTICLE TO SAVE MY POINT OF VIEW IN MY OWN ARCHIVE WHILE WIKIPEDIA GAVE A PUBLISH BUTTON AT THE END OF EDITING!? THERE MIGHT BE A BETTER SYSTEM BY ALLOWING THE USERS TO JOIN EDITORS CLUB TO GAIN AN APPROVAL IF EDIT AND PUBLISH ICONS ARE USELESS. IT IS AGAINST LOGIC AND WELL MANNER TO INVITE THE PUBLICITY TO JOIN IN THEN REJECT THEIR CONTRIBUTION WITH THE WORD " DISRUPTIVE". I DEMAND A SPECIAL SECTION FOR ALL CONTRIBUTERS TO WRITE DOWN THEIR POINT OF VIEW ABOUT ANY MENTIONED ARTICLE THAT CONTAINED FIXED INFORMATION WITH USELESS EDIT AND NON WORKING PUBLISHING BUTTON.YOU MAY CALL IT A DEBATE BETTER THAN EDITING TO ALLOW ALL TO PARTICIPATE.SUCH ARTICLES NEEDED TO BE EDITED, DEBATED AND PUBLISHED. BEST WISHES AND GOOD LUCK Michaelpowerfullwings (talk) 09:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Society have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Society was changed by Michaelpowerfullwings (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870004 on 2021-09-15T07:21:19+00:00

IT IS ALL IN YOUR BRAIN ENVELOPE
SOMETIMES, PEOPLE LEAP ON THEIR BEST MEMORIES IN ORDER TO SAVE THE BEST FOR LAST. NOBODY IS SURE IF THEY ARE HAPPY OR NOT UNLESS THEY REMEMBER. THEY MIGHT REMEMBER HAPPY MEMORIES FROM THE PAST OR JUST THINK ABOUT THEIR FUTURE AND THEIR BEST COMING EVENTS WHICH MAKE THEM HAPPY. WE SEE, WE HEAR, WE MOVE AND WE RECIEVE. A COLLECTION OF ACTS DESIGN OUR HAPPINESS OR UNFORTUNATELY, OUR SADNESS. THIS IMPACTS HOW WE TREAT PEOPLE AND HOW WE WISH TO BE TREATED. IT IS NOT YOUR LUCKY NUMBER OR YOUR CHARM! IT IS YOUR DESTINY AND THE CHOICES YOU MAKE. THEY ARE ALL IN THE ENVELOPE OF YOUR BRAIN. IF YOU RELAX AND WRITE DOWN ALL YOUR HAPPY TIMES VERSUS YOUR SAD TIMES OR HARD TIMES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE THE JUDGE OF YOUR ACTIONS AND YOU ARE GOING TO CRITICIZE YOUR CHOICES IF YOU ARE STILL AND DOING NO ACTIONS AT THE TIME. JUST DRAW THE TIME LINE AND YOU ARE GOING TO UNDERSTAND THE RESULTS OF BEING HAPPY, OPTIMISTIC, PESSIMISTIC OR SAD. Michaelpowerfullwings (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)