User talk:Michaelthomason

Image:JenniferHurtCoEdMSept2006Wk1001_562lo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JenniferHurtCoEdMSept2006Wk1001_562lo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 00:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Uploading the image under a different filename and stating that Playboy releases the image for any use despite it's copyright is both legally wrong and harmful to Wikipedia. Please do not attempt to skirt around licensing issues with Wikipedia. This could be a blockable offense. -- MECU ≈ talk 01:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:JenniferHurtCoEdMSept2006Wk1001 562lo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JenniferHurtCoEdMSept2006Wk1001 562lo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jennifer Hurt


The article Jennifer Hurt has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ENT, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Sandra Hubby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandra Hubby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sandra Hubby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens .rf 02:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)