User talk:Michalides~enwiki

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  --ITasteLikePaint (talk) 19:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Gabčíkovo - Nagymaros Dams
Hi,

I know you have made your edits in good faith and understand that nobody likes if his work has been deleting. But i can't accept your changes at all. The stable version of this article is still not good. Ok.. you have Slovak sources. However this is a VERY CONTROVERSIAL ACTUAL POLITICAL topic. Your addition could remain only with a TOTALLY DISPUTED template in the current version. However this solution also would not be good. So, i have been deleting your changes.--Nmate (talk) 07:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you won´t back your statement up, I can´t accept your unsubstantiate changes. Your premonition is no reason for doing so. There are many new informations about the dam and lawsuit, if you don´t like some of them, we could discuss about it and you can also implement hungarian point of view, which I don´t know too much. I can not accept your rough deletion. I´m just affraid, that you dont´t have much relevant to say to the topic, do you?--Michalides (talk) 07:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, I go to the talk page.--Nmate (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahoj M, its O.K. to me.--Nmate (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Rozgony
What did you do at Elonka, anyway? The administrators are not interested in these things. In this case you ought to go here: Requested moves.--Nmate (talk) 09:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Good, but where is the reason? Also you should check what PeterRet did in a similar case:
 * Sorry, I´m affraid I don´t understand. Do you want to translate Rozhanovce into english?--Michalides (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Not, i think you uderstand me well. I think it was correct what you did. After this it will be a short debate and a poll about your request on the talk page of this article. And some English and/or American people like this kind of procedure. So, they take part in it.--Nmate (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia wins a man, who can yell louder, somebody said. And english wiki is obviously under ocupation of hungarian nationalists, so I doubt the simple sences would win in most slovak-hungarian cases like this. But do as you want to. And don´t be cheeky, I´m new here (and badly surprised by many slovak-hungarian articles).--Michalides (talk) 16:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It is very probably your attempt will be unsucessfull in this case. Because the Battle of Rozhanovce has not been used in English. But this is not a relevant article. Just 379 people read it in the last month. However there are several  relevant articles like, etc... on wikipedia.Still it needs a lot of work.--Nmate (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are more important articles, which would need a big corrections, but after my experiences here, I have no more power to argue for every sentence. I just begun to read the article about Slovakia: In 623, the Slavic population living in the western parts of Pannonia seceded from their (Avars) empire. No, thanks. Maybe later. Now I need a holiday.--Michalides (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  Hobartimus (talk) 11:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I haven´t "attacked" editors, I have "attacked" you, for multiple vandalizing articles, hungarizing many names and continuing to disgust slovak and other editors. Hungarian (Kingdom of Hungary) topics edited by you and a few other hungarian nationalists are a shame of this version of Wikipedia and would deserve to be rebuilt. But anyway, I will try not to do it again and I hope, that we (slovaks and hungarians) will be able to rebuild the articles constructively.--Michalides (talk) 12:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Michalides. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Michalides~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)