User talk:Michalws

Image copyright problem with Image:Poselska by MSteckiw.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Poselska by MSteckiw.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Canada
The article already contains several images of Montreal. And by adding your image where you did, you're also messing up the page formatting because text cannot wrap around two images simultaneously — which means that your image causes the Niagara Falls image on the other side of the page to overlap the text, which is absolutely not permissible. Please do not readd the image to this article yourself. Bearcat 21:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Europe
Please do not add random images to this article in places where they obviously do not belong. Mathsci 09:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Poland
Witaj w angielskiej Wikipedii. You uploaded a few pictures from Kraków and added them to many different articles at the same time. I’m afraid, this is not how we do things around here. First of all, the pictures should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, providing that you are the copyright owner. Second, there are galleries of pictures from Kraków in Commons where your pictures should go first under free GNU licence, not repetitiously in every article related to Kraków. And finally, the way you put them in messes up the layouts and logical progression of some of those articles. I’d like to ask you to upload your pictures to Commons first (here), and put them in galleries by adding categories and please, use each picture in the maximum of two articles which are not directly related. Thanks. Please use following categories when saving your pictures: --Poeticbent talk
 * You added picture “Sukiennice by MSteckiw.jpg” to eight articles. Not good...
 * The picture “Rynek by MSteckiw.jpg” is added to seven articles. Why?
 * The picture “Slowacki by MSteckiw.jpg” is added to seven articles, etc.
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * etc.
 * etc.
 * etc.
 * etc.
 * etc.

September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. It is very nice that you are donating so many images to the Wikipedia community. However, you cannot use articles or other Wikipedia pages to advertise yourself or your work. Advertising, and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox", is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Ckatz chat spy  18:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WCS2.png


The file File:WCS2.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cathedral of Montreal by MSteckiw.jpg


The file File:Cathedral of Montreal by MSteckiw.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused. Low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Cathedral-Basilica of Mary, Queen of the World."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Montreal Skyline by MSteckiw.jpg


The file File:Montreal Skyline by MSteckiw.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused. Low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Views from Mount Royal (mountain)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Montreal Port by MSteckiw.jpg


The file File:Montreal Port by MSteckiw.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused. Low quality. Superseded by File:Montréal 302 (35877228203).jpg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Toronto by MS.jpg


The file File:Toronto by MS.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused low quality image"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:International Wireless Cities Summit in Toronto, January 2007.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:International Wireless Cities Summit in Toronto, January 2007.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:OldPort by Msteckiw.jpg


The file File:OldPort by Msteckiw.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:MontmorrencyFalls by MSteckiw.jpg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)