User talk:Michel Esperanza

We believe that a bigraphy as is sad in Wikipedia is a detailed description of a person's life. It involves more than just the basic facts like education, work, relationships, and death, but also portrays a subject's experience of these life events. The former biography talks about mainly of an isolated event occurred in the past Chocktruls life which is insignificant to portrait as supposed to be a complete biography.Michel Esperanza (talk) 10:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know who you are talking to, but take it to the talk page means "of the article in question", not "to your personal user talk page". Also, I have reverted your edits; Wiki practice is to take it to talk when your edits are contested, and they are because you are adding massive amounts of uncited material to a biography of a living person. Ogress smash! 21:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Ogress. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. Thank you. Ogress smash! 22:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Trijang Lobsang Yeshe Tenzin Gyatso, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Take this to talk: your edits are massive and clearly opposed. Ogress smash! 19:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)