User talk:Michelle.naquin

Speedy deletion of Green technology alliance
A tag has been placed on Green technology alliance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RayAYang (talk) 21:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Green technology alliance, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Green technology alliance appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Green technology alliance has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Green technology alliance and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Green technology alliance with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Green technology alliance.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.

Even though it appears you are connected with the organization (which does create a conflict of interest), we cannot accept text that appears under copyright at another site. If the organization is deserving of an article, it should have neutral prose written about it, not a verbatim copy of what can be found elsewhere on the web. —C.Fred (talk) 21:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Green Technology Alliance
Hi Michelle,

The reason your article was deleted was because there is a copyright tag on the source that your article was copied and pasted from. I'm not sure you fully understand the ramification of releasing the information under the GFDL. Nevertheless, even if it were not copyright violation, I'm not entirely sure this organization would meet our criteria for inclusion for corporations here: WP:CORP. And lastly, there is a conflict of interests in you, the CEO of this organization, creating the article for it. All that being said, I have emailed you the contents of the article. Please review the guidelines I've linked above before re-introducing it. – xeno  ( talk ) 17:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * As for the links you added in other articles, please see our policy on external links here: WP:EL and a related guideline here: WP:LINKSPAM. – xeno  ( talk ) 17:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm still not sure that the Green Technology Alliance would qualify for inclusion based on the primary criterion at WP:CORP. A Google news search turned up only 1 hit: http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&q=%22green%20technology%20alliance%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn, a press release which does not qualify to establish notability. A regular Google search turned up mostly primary sources and blogs which won't help either. If you want to provide me with a few links that you think would establish the notability for this company, I can take a look, but at the present time it appears to be too new to satisfy inclusion criteria. As for your concerns about the different types of green technology and categories and such, I think the best thing for you to do would be to join the Environment WikiProject and discuss these proposed improvements at WT:ENV for assistance in making it happen. – xeno  ( talk ) 17:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)