User talk:Michellevaz1984

Welcome!
Hello, Michellevaz1984, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 13:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

The editing of the article
Is a give away with the names of the current council - that is not current WP:MOS or what WP:ABOUT.

Please read the messages above carefully, and re-think the process of changing the article - within the terms of what makes a good article - and what WP:NOT and WP:COI is about, thank you JarrahTree 13:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JarrahTree 13:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Outdated
Maybe - when updating - you must understand what the messages above are for. The COI is still obvious, but at least you have modified the MOS bizarre bits. Thanks for taking the effort to tone down the really weird MOS issues.

Please read more of the other articles that are similar - it is always worth seeing how the CoM in other states articles look. One classic give away of COI from NGOS and gov agencies is the list of aims/plans by dot point - it is appreciated you did not re-include them. Please, if you have any influence on any of the companies listed - consider asking the Adelaide group of wikipedians about a possible conversation about the processes of updating company, mining and related articles - it could be of interest to both sides, I think JarrahTree 14:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Brandname
You have uploaded an image to commons - and claim copyright - however the chamber of mines website has nothing about what rights are ascribed to the material that is found on it - please consider that adding the brandname as you have stated - may be a copyright issue. Please check - if the website is actually (c) or not, or what rights are held over the website. JarrahTree 14:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to South Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CataracticPlanets (talk) 00:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Not sure
Whether you have read the messages above, but it is still like you might not understand basic WP:MOS principles.


 * The Lead sentence in an encyclopedia is not a bragging event, it may be on a blog.
 * The removal of content, and claiming yourself as a source seems to completely miss the point of WP:RS.

Please, for your own sake, re-read the messages, and try to understand that no communication here, and simply changing the article - will not solve the problems that have been created by your changes. JarrahTree 05:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Working on the South Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy article
Hi! JarrahTree asked me to stop by and see if I can help. Hopefully I can. :) Am I right in assuming that you are connected with SACME? This isn't a problem as such - but it would help clarify how to tackle the changes. Wikipedia is happy for people connected to organisations to help with articles - after all, they normally know the subject best - but the trick is how to balance a risk of a conflict of interest with Wikipedia's goal of neutrality. It is a complex problem, but not unsolvable. - Bilby (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

South Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy, you may be blocked from editing.

Several editors, most particularly, have been VERY polite to you and have gone to great efforts to explain to you that wikipedia is NOT facebook, it is NOT your private advertising website, it is not a blog. It is an encyclopaedia. Q: Why does one consult an encyclopedia? A: To get historical facts. Despite your own personal view of the world, let me educate you that history does NOT get "out-of-date". Facts might get out of date, at which point they become history. This has been explained to you, very politely, several times, by several people. You don't appear to have paid any, or failing that, very much attention. None of us have infinite patience. Your edits have long ago moved to the area of being "disruptive" and "nuisance". You have made no obvious attempt to engage in WP:BRD. If someone else doesn't get there before me, you're next nuisance edit will result in a report to WP:AIV or WP:ANI or similar, and you will very likely be blocked - i.e. prevented from further editing.

Your alternatives include discussing stuff you're not happy about here on your talk page. You'll find that in such circumstances eveyone you're annoying because your not explaining yourself will be happy to listen and engage with you. But if you just pig-headedly ignore the people who are trying to help you, you won't make much progress. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * a) Please read WP:BRD
 * b) Please explain which bit of WP:BRD is not clear to you.
 * Pdfpdf (talk)

Content Update on the Sacome wikipedia page
Hello

The content appearing about SACOME on Wikipedia is outdated. As i have been trying to edit the information, its strange that the the old content keeps reflecting back and i am not permitted to delete the below sections despite they being non relevant to the brand which i explained earlier in my remarks Sections -Dirt TV awards -Advocacy - image of the CEO ( as he has resigned 18 months ago from sacomeMichellevaz1984 (talk) 13:35, 30 May 2018 (UTC))Michellevaz1984 (talk) 13:35, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Michelle 1984

Kind Regards Michelle


 * That makes some sense. With regard to the concern that some points are not relevant to the brand, the issue there is that Wikipedia is more of a historical record, so we tend to keep things that were important in the past. What we're failing to do is identify them as no longer relevant. I guess I have two things I want to do with the article - make sure that past activities are clearly identified as past, and expand the core description to make sure it is accurate to what SACOME is today. Just to knock off a minor issue, as we have to start somewhere, is Rebecca Knol the current CEO? - Bilby (talk) 13:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Thats right- Rebecca Knol is the current CEO for SACOME. Michellevaz1984 (talk) 14:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I would also like to check on the possibility of updating the current CEO image.is it permitted.Michellevaz1984 (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * We should be able to do that. The problem there is an issue of copyright - it would need to be one taken by you personally, or one that has been released under creative commons by the photographer. I think the first problem is to get the name updated, though. - Bilby (talk) 14:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)