User talk:Michoball

Your edit summaries
I realize that you are new to the site. However, you should be aware that making false claims - such as your utterly untrue and completely unwarranted claim of "vandalism" - is generally regarded as disruptive behaviour. At the very least, you could have asked instead of using such a confrontational and incorrect summary. --Ckatz chat spy  20:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lorenzo Iorio


A tag has been placed on Lorenzo Iorio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 21:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Lorenzo Iorio
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lorenzo Iorio, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.syrexe.com/97591670.html. As a copyright violation, Lorenzo Iorio appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lorenzo Iorio has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lorenzo Iorio and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Lorenzo Iorio with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lorenzo Iorio.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Michoball (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Deleted because it is a copyright violation, not rephrased nearly enough. "Copyright © 2011 Scholarly Research Exchange. All Rights Reserved."  -- Y not? 23:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * See also Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Iorio -- Y not? 23:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The administrator who closed the deletion discussion determined that Mr. Iorio is not a notable scientist. The only proper course for you is to request review of that decision on the deletion review page. -- Y not? 00:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Michoball, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Comment copied from DRV, plus advice
If you think you can make a better article which demonstrates that Lorio meets the notability standard of WP:PROF, the best thing to do would be to make a draft in your user space at User talk:Michoball/Lorenzo Lorio - just click on that "red-link" to start. Read WP:Your first article before you start. Be careful about copying material from elsewhere - even minor rewording is not enough to avoid a breach of copyright, see Copy-paste. Also, do not be too reliant on comparisons with existing articles; many of them are sub-standard, and probably Wikipedia's standards have risen over time. For that reason What about that other article? is not an argument accepted in deletion discussions. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M-quotient


The article M-quotient has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable, only reference is blog-like.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gerardw (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Royal Astronomical Society
From their website:
 * "Fellowship... is open to any person over the age of 18 whose application is acceptable to the Society. Around half the Fellowship consists of PhD-level professional scientists... a quarter are postgraduate researchers or retired scientists; and the remainder are amateur scientists and undergraduates."
 * How to join: "There are two standard routes for applications for Fellowship: If you know a Fellow personally, you may ask them to nominate you... If not, you can apply directly to the Council of the Society... All elections are at the discretion of Council."

It is clear from the website that "election" is the name for the process by which the Council approves applications. There is no separate, higher class of "Elected fellows": all members of the society are called "Fellows", and they include "amateur scientists and undergraduates". Presenting fellowship as a high academic honour is misleading, and will be seen to be misleading by anyone who knows the RAS or checks their website.

I am not objecting for the sake of objecting, but for the good of your article: if you make exaggerated claims, (a) it seems as though you are desperate, and (b) you are only giving objectors something to object to.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Further to my earlier question
I am guessing you'll get a kick out of this. Enjoy! -- Y not? 19:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)