User talk:Micilini

Speedy deletion nomination of Sync people
Hello Micilini,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sync people for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Musa Talk ☻ 00:48, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sync people, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Musa Talk ☻ 01:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Sync people. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Musa Talk ☻ 01:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Sync people, you may be blocked from editing. GABHello! 01:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Sync people.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)