User talk:Mickey gfss2007

 Hi Mickey gfss2007, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Button sig2.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

 Good luck, and have fun. --Subdolous (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Gary valenciano.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gary valenciano.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Religious belief of politicians
Can you please source all of your edits concerning religious beliefs of politicians? If you fail to do so, your edits might be reverted. Thanks. --Angelo (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Origin usage in template:Infobox musical artist
Please see the field descriptions in template:Infobox musical artist for proper use of the "origin" and "born" parameters. Origin is NOT the same as born. Birth location is included in the born parameter. Also see WP:FLAG for reasons that the flag icons are NOT to be used with birth location. --NrDg 17:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Ireland
Hi. According to the Constitution of Ireland, the name of the state is (in English) "Ireland", and (in Irish) "Éire". Under the Republic of Ireland Act, the description of the state is the "Republic of Ireland". If you read the intro to the RoI article, the "name" section in that article, or any number of related articles, you would note confirmation of this. Your repeated changes to the template on the relavant page are therefore not appropriate. Please stop changing it. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Approaching 3RR vio
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Dppowell (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Government type
Hi, I saw you did lots of edits regarding countries government type. Could you please share the information source as otherwise it might be considered as vandalism. Thanks. Steelmate (talk) 04:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC) (moved by Larklight (talk) 09:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC))

A tag has been placed on Vic Mercado requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If the subject conforms to any of the guidelines at WP:Music, tag the article with and add it in. That'll keep it from deletion. Pishogue (talk) 20:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Adding Religion to all of the Prime Minister's pages
Please stop doing this. The addition of religion in the Prime Minister's infobox is untidy, unverifiable for some of them, and also unnecessary. Religion has played an insignificant role in Australia's political history, unlike some countries, and so having their personal religion in the infobox is out of place. The other editor who claims to have consensus on religion in the infobox "per other world leaders" is mistaken, because no consensus has been taken for quite some time on the issue and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is hardly a reason.

Thanks to you, I now have all 26 Prime Ministers of Australia watchlisted, and I am now prepared to revert you at every turn until you reply on a talk page with your solid reasoning rather than just blindly adding content, most of which is not cited. But please save me all the trouble and do this without re-adding the information without discussion and consensus.  DEVS EX MACINA  pray 23:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Mickey, are you aware of this discussion and the out come. --Domer48 14:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Adding infoboxes for classical musicians
Please stop doing this. These infoboxes are inappropriate for opera singers and classical musicians. See the policy at WikiProject Musicians: "Infobox Musical artist is the standard template to be used on a non-classical musician's or musical ensemble's page" and at the Opera Project. Thanks in advance for your cooperation.Voceditenore (talk) 22:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * DO NOT PUT INFOBOXES in all Classical Music singers!! I am sure you could read clearly when you edited the article! I have undo all infoboxes in classical music singers. This is start to annoy me! - Jay (talk) 01:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I see you have reverted the infobox on Dennis O'Neill again. Please don't do this. It's disruptive and it's a waste of everybody's time - especially yours! Thanks for your understanding. -- Kleinzach (talk) 12:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Queen (band)
Hi, I noticed some of your formatting edits to musical articles. Before making edits like this, it would be worth boning up on our manual of style and policies. Doing things like changing the flags, categories around etc does more harm than good and adds nothing to the article. Linking years adds nothing to the article either. If you would like something useful to do please let me know. Best wishes, --John (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. You may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically see WP:MOSFLAG. This also applies to the changes you made to Ruben Studdard, Fantasia, Carrie Underwood, Taylor Hicks, Jordin Sparks, Justin Guarini, Clay Aiken, and Diana DeGarmo.

Also, Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Please use the edit summary so other people know why you are making the changes you are making. Aspects (talk) 02:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Slapshock
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Slapshock, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Slapshock is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Slapshock, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Letting redirects work
Hi. Thanks for your work on the infoboxes of Canadian PM's. One thing, though: there is no need to turn redirects into piped links. For instance, there is no problem with Anglican; no need to change it to Anglican. There's no real harm in making such an edit, either, so far as I know, provided it is done in conjunction with some other editing (if done just for its own sake, the making of the edit burdens Wikipedia much more than the ongoing working of the redirect), but you could save yourself the trouble. Wikipedia has redirects for a reason; it is fine to just let them work. Best regards, Lonewolf BC (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Peel District School Board
If possible, when you have time, can you add elementary and middle schools that has their own articles, referring to the chart in Peel District School Board, to Template:PeelDistrictSchools please? And also add the template to those articles.. thanks. I just don't have time, plus my computer is way too slow for me to open a new window just to paste a template to each and every article. --staka (T) 03:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

From New Life Christian Center
Dear Mickey gfss2007

Shalom...

I am Joy Lopido, the Executive Secretary of our Deputy Senior Pastor, Shoddy Chase. In behalf of New Life Christian Center, we would like to thank you for initially creating a page for us.

We just found this page recently and we have updated some of the informations you have initially posted. Should you want to add more information regarding New Life Christian Center, please do not hesitate to visit our website or email us at newlife@newlife.ph or mlopez@newlife.ph.

We hope you would not mind if from time to time, we would be updating this page as we continually grow in the Ministry. We would want to hear from you, either thru email or even call us at +6328091542 to 43.

God bless,

Joy Lopido New Life Christian Center —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.213.113.90 (talk) 02:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mon Faustino
A tag has been placed on Mon Faustino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. --Dynaflow  babble  21:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Toutes Les Filles
I have nominated Toutes Les Filles, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Toutes Les Filles. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. roux   00:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Mickey gfss2007! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Egay Gonzales -
 * 2) Jay Durias -
 * 3) Ric Mercado -
 * 4) Danny Tan -
 * 5) Raul Mitra -
 * 6) Tats Faustino -

Nomination for deletion of Template:Toutes Les Filles
Template:Toutes Les Filles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danny Tan


The article Danny Tan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails to meet both GNG and WP:MUSBIO. The only reference is a dead link. The wayback machine shows a page with a single mention along with others within a first bracket.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bisswajit (talk) 16:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Egay Gonzales


The article Egay Gonzales has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable wp:musicbio with zero sources to support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bisswajit (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Cathedral of Praise
Please fix the sourcing problems -- it was proposed for deletion! Bearian (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)