User talk:Mickey west

“As I was previously told” ? ( might be a good idea to choose your words more carefully ) If I am not to write this about myself who then ? you I do not have the luxury of reading everything written, and considering the negative and condescending nature, it is even less likely. It would be more helpful to assist me or my staff in the correct manner to accomplish this. ( short version please )
 * Please sign talk page posts with ~ to put your signature and the time stamp on. You were previously told. Melcous did it with a template, and I did it in my own words. If you click on 'History' at the top of this, and then on the date by my name, you can see the links to the policies. Basically, anyone not connected to you who thinks you are notable enough can write about you. So long as they do it neutrally (see other articles for an idea of the style), and reference it with reliable independent sources. Any unreferenced bio of a living person that isn't referenced can be deleted after seven days however notable they are or how neutral the article appears to be. Please be aware that articles here, unlike at Facebook or LinkedIn etc, are not owned by the subject or the creator, and properly referenced material added by other contributors may not be removed even if the subject doesn't like it. Wikipedia articles are 'warts and all', just like Cromwell's portrait. Please also note that if anyone in your employ, either as a staff member or through being paid as a consultant or agent, must declare this under WP:TOU (our terms of use). If this is too long, I apologise. I'd rather be clear than give a short reply that would be regarded as rude. What you posted would be fine at Facebook or Twitter (or MySpace if that's still going). It does not fit here. Please bear in mind that there is no 'right' to have an article here. Content must be in accordance with our policies. Peridon (talk) 09:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mickey west


A tag has been placed on User:Mickey west, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Peridon (talk) 09:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)