User talk:Mickiewicz

Peter Borish
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peter borish, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.marketswiki.com/mwiki/Peter_F._Borish.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 14:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter borish


A tag has been placed on Peter borish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Borish


A tag has been placed on Peter Borish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scopecreep (talk) 03:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Peter Borish
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Peter Borish. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Peter Borish. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Peter Borish, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Reported to AIV
Hi Mickiewicz, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at Peter Borish to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Borish


The article Peter Borish has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Scopecreep (talk) 04:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Peter Borish. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 11:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * }


 * I do have a good deal of sympathy with you. I know from when I first started editing Wikipedia that Wikipedia can seem a daunting place, with apparently arbitrary procedures. However, there are reasons why things work the way they do, and perhaps it may help a little if I try to explain a few things. Firstly, your understanding of copyright law does not seem to be very complete. The fact that content has been published in various places does not mean that it loses copyright, nor does the fact that you give references to those places. However, even if the copyright on the material has been waived, we still need evidence that it is so. Unfortunately, Wikipedia gets thousands of people coming here and posting copyright infringing material, and many of those people misrepresent the status of the material. We therefore cannot simply take the word of anyone who chooses to edit here for copyright. That is why we have a procedure for donating copyright, and you were given links to information about the procedure three times (see above). You were also repeatedly informed that removing the speedy deletion notice was unacceptable. Twice on this page you were given instructions how to contest the speedy deletion, in addition to the instructions repeatedly posted to the article itself. You were then given a warning that doing the same again would lead to a block. While I do accept that you were not acting maliciously, it is certainly not the case that your block came out of the blue, and you were given explanations as to what you could have done to avoid the block.


 * Writing an article about your friend may not be advisable. Wikipedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and it can be difficult for someone closely involved with the subject of an article to stand back and see their own writing from the perspective of an uninvolved outsider, which often results in the appearance of promotional writing, even if that was not the intention. That is one of the reasons why Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages writing on such a subject. Also, Wikipedia's notability criteria are based essentially on a subject's having received a substantial amount of coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. Whether a subject is noble or ignoble makes no difference, and being "a very generous philanthropist" is not a reason for having a Wikipedia article.


 * Finally, a few words of advice on how to proceed if you do wish to continue contributing to Wikipedia (which I hope you will). In my experience, people who dive straight into writing new articles very often have the sort of frustrating experience you have had. What I have seen over the years has convinced me that a far better approach is to start by looking at existing articles, and making minor edits to them, improving details here and there. That way, you can gradually learn how Wikipedia functions. Mistakes that you make (which you will make, as we all do) will be small ones, and you won't have lost significant amounts of work. After a while, when you have built up experience, and know better how things work here, you will be ready to write new articles. I am also posting a welcome message above, with links to various pages with further information. Don't try to read and learn everything before you do any more editing: there is far too much material there for you to do so. However, do have a look at the pages which seem most relevant. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

References for entry for Peter Borish biography
I am proactively stating that I intend to remove the following tags because I have added multiple reliable sources

{{Prod blp/dated|concern=All

Nomination of Peter Borish for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Borish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter Borish& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 13:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Sock-puppet
Sock-puppet of Borish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.21.214 (talk) 11:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sock-puppet of Peter Borish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.21.214 (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)