User talk:Mickman1234

Userboxes
Hi! See this page.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 22:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Swiss Space Office
A tag has been placed on Swiss Space Office requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FrankTobia (talk) 05:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ALV X-1
A tag has been placed on ALV X-1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  05:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of HotPay-2
A tag has been placed on HotPay-2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Closedmouth (talk) 15:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Vatican City / Freedom
Hello--Where did the rating of Vatican City come from in List of indices of freedom? I wasn't able to find it. Cretog8 (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I meant, what was your source for it? Cretog8 (talk) 17:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll remove the stuff on Vatican City, then. The stuff in that article is supposed to come from existing indices of freedom, rather than our observations. How about your other recent edits? Were those from indices, or from you?Cretog8 (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:I have a question sir.
Have we developed the technology to make a new eye for someone thats blind of lost an eye, have you developed an eye thats like a perfect eye like the one your born with, that can see in 20/20 or less or better and in color? Mickman1234 (talk) 07:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Currently, the research is under progress to give some vision back to patients with defects in individual parts of the eye. However at this time, a "Bionic implantable eye", "starting from scratch - the one we are born with" is not commercially available. That said, many patients with different conditions can definitely be helped, depending on the individual problem. If you have such a patient, please do contact a qualified eye specialist for possible options. EyeMD T 17:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

List of space agencies
Sure, I can do: which ones do you know need updating? Alternatively, you can update them yourself - but please provide references. Mike Peel (talk) 10:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I have a question sir about the XB-70 Valkriye
(Moved from User talk:Fnlayson)

Do you belive that they should bring it back into developement, i mean why did they have a slower B-52 into service and that aircraft only goes 650 mph and the XB-70 Valkriye goes 2,056 mph, and a high speed bomber would be great to have in service, do you aggre? And the plane could be modified a bit like v-wings in the back and a non-hexagontal wing design and a better type of engine. So im just wondering do you aggre? Mickman1234 (talk) 09:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The B-70 had Mach 3 speed at only high altitude and subsonic speed at low altitude. It's too risky for a bomber or other aircraft to fly high like that and invade enemy territory.  A future bomber (USAF 2037 Bomber maybe) will probably be more like a stealthy B-1A; Mach 2 speed at high altitude / Mach ~1 at low altitude with stealth characteristics.  That's what I think anyway... -Fnlayson (talk) 14:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Floaters
Do you know what Floaters are? My mom has them. Mickman1234 (talk) 07:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Mickman, Please see the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floater
 * If the problem continues, please show her to an eye specialist. EyeMD T 20:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * RE:Lens transplant is called cataract surgery done by phacoemulsification. Check those out. There are videos on the net floating around also, in case you want to see how its done. EyeMD T 16:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Black Brant
Hi, you wanted to know if you could ask me a question, and I replied at my talk page. I haven't heard from you since. Has your problem been resolved? Thanks -- G W … 21:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: This needs to be done

 * -- G W … 22:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Companhia Espacial Portuguesa
A tag has been placed on Companhia Espacial Portuguesa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 18:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 G W … 11:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And another one. -- G W … 07:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And another -- G W … 08:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Another one
 G W … 16:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience
Acupuncture is already on the list. I have undone your edit. Unomi (talk) 08:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2014 in spaceflight


The article 2014 in spaceflight has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A little too premature

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 07:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2013 in spaceflight
I have nominated 2013 in spaceflight, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/2013 in spaceflight. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rasputin72 (talk) 04:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern. Please feel free to come to me whenever you have any questions or suggestions. Rasputin72 (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * We asked you not to create these articles for more than two years ahead of time, and 2011 in spaceflight and 2012 in spaceflight already exist. -MBK004 05:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't delete them now, they are at a deletion process now. As to your non-knowledge, we let you know at Talk:2014 in spaceflight. As to wanting to learn, you need to closely look at WP:TLS. -MBK004 05:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, your userspace is free for experimentation. What plenty of users do is create their own "sandbox" for them to be able to do things without messing up their own userpage. Here is a redlink to one for you to create: User:Mickman1234/Sandbox -MBK004 05:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * (popping in here) - yes, I use a sandbox as well, mainly to store text I wrote and don't need or stuff I haven't finished yet. See User:The_ed17/Sandbox. :) Kind regards, — Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  05:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2014 in spaceflight
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 2014 in spaceflight. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/2014 in spaceflight. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
— Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  21:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

1974 in spaceflight
Please stop adding flags to the TLS articles that are still in the old style. It is poor form to be blending the two formats together. Not to mention that you are getting their positioning incorrect. I plan on converting the rest over the next month. Please let those who know what they are doing take care of them so it is done quickly. -MBK004 06:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no need for you to apologize. You made an error, but you did not know not to. You do now. Keep learning, and one day you will know how to do things, and if you have questions, do not hesitate to ask. -MBK004 07:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ill Payne


The article Ill Payne has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 04:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ill Payne


A tag has been placed on Ill Payne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rotorcowboy (talk) 04:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Ill Payne
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ill Payne. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Ill Payne, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 06:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. When you recently edited 2013 in spaceflight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AEB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)