User talk:MicroPowerpoint/Archive 4

Discussion at Articles for deletion/Watch Out (Dirtyphonics and Bassnectar song)
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Watch Out (Dirtyphonics and Bassnectar song). You might want to put your thoughts in on this discussion as the contributor that tagged this page for notability. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  18:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Firepower Records
How is Beatport not a reliable source for a discography? It has every release on it and every number catalog associated with it, unlike some of the releases on discogs. Plus discogs is 3 months late concerning the releases when beatport has them instantly and even before they get released. I really don't get why you keep changing it as it's objectively better at showing the up to date sources. Do you even compare the two websites or do you just stand with discogs because that's what you're used to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarcastic Bear (talk • contribs) 12:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Beatport is an online retailer. Micro (Talk) 12:38, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

About Vaporwave being labeled as a "microgenre"
What sources are you using? It's technically subjective. There's so many sub genres. It's been recolonized as a musical style. Look at the google trends page: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=%2Fm%2F0_qltqd If anything dubstep is way more of a microgenre. As it was very faded. It became popular way quicker and died quicker: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=%2Fm%2F07s72n

Also see this https://external-preview.redd.it/HKeBHdXrhsxIzqhECCtwoz3ASUZdHYHKzLrcT7kPzV8.jpg?auto=webp&s=eed171ea5e1c22ef1afe48b19bf390695e790499

Plese define a "microgenre". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.76.35 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 * A microgenre is basically a genre that won't last very long and is pretty much a trend. Dubstep has been around since the early 2000s and is still going. For a source that says that vaporwave is a microgenre, see. Micro (Talk) 21:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ephixa has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ephixa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ephixa (March 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ephixa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ephixa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ephixa Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ephixa reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please note
Hi, thanks for your contributions. Please note this "script" edit of one of your created articles. There are a number of issues, including overlinking of common terms and (here, US) consistency of date formats. My very best to you. Tony (talk)  10:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (FTW (Lets Be Friends song)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating FTW (Lets Be Friends song).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Haywyre Rewrite
Hi there, I have overhauled the article on Haywyre and I'd like to let you check it out (as you are an active editor on the article). You can find more information on the relevant talk page entry here. B4shful (talk) 19:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * User:B4shful No. Micro (Talk) 23:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I only just realised that in my previous correspondence I left out the entire purpose of the message. It's just to let associated editors know what I'm doing and in case they want to raise any issues/feedback with their work possibly being overwritten in the future. If you don't wish to be involved, that's okay. My original message came off as obnoxious, this was unintended. B4shful (talk) 23:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:K-391
Hey, since I know you have some experience editing EDM articles, do you have anything you want to add to this draft? I currently have a deletion review open for the subject and am trying to prove that the article at least meets Criteria 2 of WP:MUSICBIO. Would you also happen to know of any additional criteria that this subject could possibly meet? Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  04:56, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * User:JalenFolf The article absolutely meets Criteria 2 of WP:MUSICBIO, but it is a mess of an article. The two biggest issues are to do with the formatting for the entire article and more importantly, a lot of the references seem... questionable. some are either not in English, or are sites I haven't heard of, so I don't know if they are usable or not. I can try to help with the formatting and see if I can replace existing references with better ones. I did a thing in my sandbox a while ago where I list a bunch of sites that prove why they are reliable and usable, basically showing their staff and editorial oversight. Might be useful to you. Micro (Talk) 05:07, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Babatunde (song)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Babatunde (song).

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Why are my vaporwave album articles being proposed for deletion?

 * Hit Vibes and Late Night Delight are two of the three (Deep Fantasy the third) that I tried to find reliable sources. Espngeek (talk) 03:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Espngeek Those three articles have like 2 or 3 reliable sources and like 10 unreliable, so they fail WP:NMUSIC. You can't just add seemingly random sources and hope it fixes it all. Some of the sources you've added weren't reliable and were just blogs with no/little editorial oversight. Plus Deep Fantasy's aritst, Surfing, isn't reliable to begin with. If you believe they are all good, go to their respective deletion proposals and write why there. Micro (Talk) 03:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the work you did on dubstep a while back. It reads like a complete story now and I might finally get around to nominating it for FA. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:20, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * User:filelakeshoe IMO, The article has a good shot at FA. Might as well nominate it when you think it's properly ready. Micro (Talk) 09:44, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caveira (Rainbow Six Siege) has been accepted
 Caveira (Rainbow Six Siege), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:53, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Caveira_(Rainbow_Six_Siege) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Caveira (Rainbow Six Siege).

User:MJL while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for accepting the article. I've uploaded the images and fixed the reference you'd marked. Micro (Talk) 01:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * [Thank you for the ping] Much appreciated! Thank you again for your work! :D &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 01:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Hibana
Hi, I just seen you created Caveira article because I'm also a fan of rainbow six sieges (which obviously many plays this game) which was well written, when I searched Hibana, I've seen loads of sources including her reception of her about toy, has sources on biography , fans redraw new look , best operator , comics, new skin and others, I think she is notable and has a lot more sources than caveira. 124.51.131.125 (talk)
 * Thanks for sending me this message. Although I plan to create as many operator pages as possible, I do have to make sure every operator I do so for has enough reliable sources and usable information. I did a quick google search for Hibana and compared it to Cav, and it seems that Hibana is mentioned in more news articles, so that's good. It pretty much just comes down to when, or even if, I get to making a page for her. I am not the only person with the ability to create R6 operator articles though, so if you wanted, you could be the change you want to see. Though I might just contradict myself and make the page in like 2 days. Micro (Talk) 00:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hibana (Rainbow Six Siege) has been accepted
 Hibana (Rainbow Six Siege), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hibana_(Rainbow_Six_Siege) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Generous editor
note, Yumiko Imagawa hasn't been linked yet to the hibana article. 124.99.109.71 (talk)

DYK for Caveira (Rainbow Six Siege)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I just came here to say congratulations on the latest DYK! It was a really well written and researched article, so I hope you get good feedback for your peer review. Hopefully it's going to receive a lot of traffic while on the main page. Keep up the great content work! &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:16, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for nominating it, hopefully it does get a peer review because of the DYK. Micro (Talk) 00:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Any time! Let me know if you ever need help with something! :D &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Caveira (Rainbow Six Siege)

 * Hi! Apologies for missing your post. At first skim, my suggestion would be to merge this article based on its sourcing and the character's relative noteworthiness in context of its parent article. Happy to say more, if useful, but a peer review from me would be along those lines. (not watching, please  if needed)  czar  19:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Future Monstercat GA nomination
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I'm almost ready to submit the Monstercat article for a Good Article review. Is there any feedback you have on it now or anything you'd like to add or edit before a member of GOCE takes over? Keep in mind there's still one source in the refideas box on the Talk page that could possibly be used, and as far as I know, it lists some info about Darlington. Jalen Folf  (talk)  19:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The article has a lot of work to be done, mostly formatting. There are plenty of single sentence paragraphs that seem like they could be re-organised or put togethor with some other paragprahs/sections. For example, there are a few sentences that say that Monstercat won something, awarded, or named as something notable. These could probably be put together in an " Accolades and awards"-type section where they can all fit together nicely. Another big example is the whole "In August 2014, Monstercat published a manifesto calling for reform of copyright law. In it, they described their desire to allow musicians more freedom in sampling other musicians' recordings." That seems pretty big and seems like it could be greatly expanded on, detailing what exectly they listed, reactions, whatever happened to it, etc. There are also other bits and pieces that would need re-working, like the whole "notable artists" bit going on, where it seems like some bias as to who goes on that list. There's also the issue of potential unreliable sources, general formatting/re-wording, removal/inclusion of bits, expansion of most subjects, etc. I pretty much just recommend putting as much stuff into the article, reliably sourced of course, and remove anything that seems to be unimportant or biased. I can't really work on it myself as I'm busy re-writing most of my Saving Light article.

Your GA nomination of Nova (RL Grime album)
The article Nova (RL Grime album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nova (RL Grime album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

This has now passed but Legobot won't deliver for some reason??? --Kyle Peake (talk) 22:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for working on it, that article was in the GA nomination process for a while. I think Legobot takes a bit, usually up to a day from experience. Cheers! Micro (Talk) 23:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)