User talk:Microfilm2012

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! undefined tausif  10:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sarah (talk) 22:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 07:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for editing Wikipedia! Need help?
Hello Microfilm2012, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! I want to invite you to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. I hope you see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 07:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DOGMA_(1994_film)
Hello Microfilm2012,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DOGMA_(1994_film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Krimin killr21 (talk) 22:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DOGMA (1994 film)


The article DOGMA (1994 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This film does not pass the notability bar. I wasn't able to find any source for the claim about Burroughs and Phoenix. (nor for the claims that it was shown on US cable and in festivals) Moreover a good chunk of the article is perilously close to a copyright violation of this plot summary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Dance of the Furies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dance of the Furies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dance of the Furies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Bloodlust (2010 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloodlust (2010 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bloodlust (2010 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 21:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Creatures of Destiny for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creatures of Destiny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Creatures of Destiny until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Shade and Shadow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shade and Shadow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shade and Shadow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabriel Maitreya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Maitreya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gabriel Maitreya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Shade and Shadow, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 20:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Creatures of Destiny. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 20:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Gabriel Maitreya, you may be blocked from editing. Mephistophelian (talk) 20:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Microfilm2012. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
 * I noticed via a search that you appear to the director of the films you keep adding. Please be aware that this can be considered self-promotion and a huge conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising yourself or your films and removing AfD templates is not the way to keep articles from being deleted. The best way to defend your articles is to discuss them on the AfD pages for each entry.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of DOGMA (1994 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DOGMA (1994 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/DOGMA (1994 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 16:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Do not remove AfD templates or discussions
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
 * Do not remove AfD templates from the pages and do not blank AfD discussions. It will not stop the AfD from happening and the only thing that will result from this is that you will end up being blocked from the AfD. Since you've continued to do this despite multiple warnings, I am going to bring this up on the Admin board for vandalism. This does not automatically mean that you will be blocked, although I can't guarantee that won't happen. It just means that you've continued to vandalize and I'm going to bring it up so the admins are aware of what is going on.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your disruptive editing
I have blocked your account indefinitely because you have consistently ignored the warnings above not to remove AfD templates from talk pages, going as far as to blank an ongoing AfD discussion. This block is not necessarily intended to be permanent, but you will remain blocked until such time you can convince an administrator that you will not continue your disruptive behaviour if unblocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 08:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Victor Maitreya concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Victor Maitreya, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Gabriel Victor Maitreya


Hello Microfilm2012. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Gabriel Victor Maitreya.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 18 November 2013 (UTC)