User talk:Microplastic Consumer

Welcome!
Peaceray (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sugi Fumi
Hello, Microplastic Consumer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sugi Fumi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sugi Fumi


Hello, Microplastic Consumer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sugi Fumi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on William McFarland (American Policeman)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page William McFarland (American Policeman), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_McFarland_(American_Policeman)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1162033729%7CWilliam%20McFarland%20(American%20Policeman)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaozicoin


A tag has been placed on Gaozicoin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Qcne (talk) 17:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Gaozicoin moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Gaozicoin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 18:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaozicoin (July 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaozicoin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Gaozicoin Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bearcat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gaozicoin reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Alright friend, thank you for looking at the article. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Vasile Tonoiu
Hello, Microplastic Consumer,

Thank you for creating Vasile Tonoiu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"I don't think this page meets the notability criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. Are there perhaps reviews of some of his works that could be cited to help establish this?

Also, the article tells the reader almost nothing about his contributions to the discipline—or even his area of specialization.

I'm not going to nominate for deletion because the current article is quite innocuous and might be improved with minimal work, should good sources exist.

If these two points are not addressed, however, I would expect another editor to make that nomination."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late response! But I mainly believe membership of the Romanian Academy qualifies him for a wiki page, despite the fact that the current page is lacking. If you have any other concerns please bring them to my attention, thanks Microplastic Consumer (talk) 03:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hi Microplastic Consumer! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. While I appreciate your hard work in finding additional candidates, adding them to the page should not be marked as a minor edit. Thank you for your work in improving Wikipedia. ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 00:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention! Moving forward, I will mark them as regular edits rather than minor. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 03:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siteny Randrianasoloniaiko, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Hi, please be sure to properly cite your sources. It is easy, in the editor just go up to the toolbar, click on the quotation marks, and paste in the link to your source. Unsourced material, such as that in the page listed above (which you created) can be removed, especially when it is in a biography of a living person as it is in this case. See WP:BLP'' AriTheHorse 02:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siteny Randrianasoloniaiko


The article Siteny Randrianasoloniaiko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The issue has been resolved. AriTheHorse 02:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gaozicoin
Hello, Microplastic Consumer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaozicoin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Naang Naang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naang Naang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Naang Naang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. signed,Rosguill talk 16:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Perez (New Hampshire politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

2025 Seattle mayoral election moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Seattle mayoral election. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:TOOSOON. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  Sounder Bruce  04:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


 * An upcoming mayoral election in a city of over 100,000 is notable- just wait for more coverage to be added Microplastic Consumer (talk) 04:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Exactly, this is a textbook case of WP:TOOSOON. A single speculative piece on potential candidates is not enough to spin off into a separate article.  Sounder Bruce  04:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Hovde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Withdrawal from Afghanistan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Everyone Knows That unofficial cover.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Everyone Knows That unofficial cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 03:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brigitte García


The article Brigitte García has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, WP:1E"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 11:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Brigitte García for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brigitte García is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brigitte García until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Yapping for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yapping, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Yapping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ermina Lekaj Prljaskaj
Hello, Microplastic Consumer,

Thank you for creating Ermina Lekaj Prljaskaj.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Good start. Please improve categorisation."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sam Sloan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Do not add citations to content that does not contain the information you claim it supports. Come on, Sam.'' – notwally (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I was very surprised to see this in my email! Let me set the record straight- I am not Sam Sloan nor do I have any association with him. If you'd have taken a look at my contributions, Sam Sloan is not a frequent topic of interest. It appears that in that edit I cited the wrong source and meant to use the MediaMax Article, which directly supported my edit. I am retired from Wikipedia and no longer have much interest in editing.
 * Thank you for reaching out,
 * Microplastic Consumer Microplastic Consumer (talk) 00:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Sam Sloan. Thank you. – notwally (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * notwally, you got all that from an infobox? Where is the SPI? Drmies (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , did you genuinely not see the other edits to content beyond the infobox, including puffing up the lead with non-notable descriptors and adding multiple pictures published by the article subject? These changes are typical of Sam Sloan's sockpuppet editing pattern. In addition, the removal of the phrase "by the couple who had adopted her" in the sentence "In 1986, he was accused of kidnapping his daughter by the couple who had adopted her" is one of the most common patterns by the sockpuppets of Sam Sloan. There are reasons why Sam Sloan has had so many sockpuppet accounts blocked, despite a general lack of SPIs, and I would encourage you to look into his history if you are not familiar with it. If you would like me to file an SPI at that point, please let me know. At least for now, others who see problematic edits by this account can be aware that more investigation may be needed. – notwally (talk) 14:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * notwally, yes, I genuinely did not see whatever you want me to see. What I did see was you throwing a really serious accusation at a user, and telling them to make their case at an SPI which doesn't exist. You should put your money where your mouth is: either you start an SPI or you don't, and if you don't, don't make these threats.As for the article and MC's supposed fluffing--they made two edits, two. I don't know how many socks are blocked, and I really don't care right now, not until there is an SPI. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * u|Drmies, feel free to look at the actual edits and get back to me then. Take care. – notwally (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Why don't you, User:Notwally, get back to me when you file the SPI and build an argument. In the meantime, stop with the accusations: this is harassment. Drmies (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello again, those pictures of him are found directly on his flickr account and were posted nearly 10 years ago. Out of my 200+ edits, less than 1% are about Sam Sloan.
 * I am from the Midwest, not New York or Virginia- that alone should prove I am not him. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Microplastic Consumer, let me know if this picks up again., these are the posts that prompted my warning--and thanks for having looked into it. Drmies (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Noel Fiorino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Boomer slang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Boomer slang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Boomer slang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Naang Naang
Hello, Microplastic Consumer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naang Naang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paul Noel Fiorino
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paul Noel Fiorino you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 01:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paul Noel Fiorino
The article Paul Noel Fiorino you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Paul Noel Fiorino for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 01:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)