User talk:Middayexpress/Archive 68

Family
Check this out:. Supposedly they both came from the same family. If this is true, then I ask why were most Somali ruling families all from the same family? Also, what exactly am I post to respond to on the Civil War? AcidSnow (talk) 02:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Brother-in-law; so it seems that Sultan Sherri was a relation by marriage. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Readdition of Jubaland flag with edit summary 'formatting'
This kind of edit. Middayexpress, for Kismayu, with the edit summary 'formatting' but actually consisting of adding the Jubaland flag, to bolster that entity's profile, is not the way we edit Wikipedia. I must kindly ask you not to game the encyclopedia/wikilawyer in this fashion. Cease misrepresenting Somali issues, please. I've asked you many times - I've run an RfC - there are only so many other dispute resolution forums to go to. Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 11:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This is the same that is done for New York City, as well as other cities in the United States: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, etc.  However, unlike US cities, Somali cities don't possess a set infobox type. Kismayo is also within the Jubbland adminstration. AcidSnow (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed. It's standard infobox formatting, and Jubaland is an autonomous region of Somalia. Middayexpress (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe I have not made myself sufficiently clear. Do not make substantive edits with misleading edit summaries, where you change the representation of the entity's political alignment. Cease and desist, please, Middayexpress. Stop the misrepresentation. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

"Neutralize" meaning you appear to have actually removed negative material about a mayor
Middayexpress, would you kindly please explain this edit? Why did you remove the valid, referenced material about a mayor in the UK, that was useful for establishing the dates he was in office? Your edit summary was "neutralize", and removing information that completes an explanation about an issue is in violation of WP:NPOV, specifically WP:YESPOV, where it indicates "Editors, while naturally having their own points of view, should strive in good faith to provide complete information." I do not know how to explain this to you more clearly. Cease and desist violating WP:NPOV, please, because after an RfC, the only option left to me is appealing to Arbcom. I have, because I've been trying to be polite, not directly indicated that I am starting to consider Arbcom, but your repeated violations of NPOV really leave me no choice but to speak plainly. Happy to explain myself more clearly if anything is not already clear. I am copying User:Cordless Larry, who raised the Somalis in the United Kingdom issue with me, and due to your diligent attention to Somali-related articles, WP:Somalia. Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 08:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Left a reply here. Middayexpress (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)