User talk:Miel Bartels

Welcome! Thanks for catching an error I made
Welcome to Wikipedia, Miel Bartels! While your first edit got reverted, it was redone shortly afterwards. Incidentally, you were fixing an error I'd made; I'd mis-parsed what the source said ("accounts of adverse effects of participating in a rite, with or without experienced guidance. These include a transient syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (Leban et al., 2016), presumed drug induced liver injury in a chronic alcoholic (Pogorzelska and Lapinski, 2017), sudden death upon chronic kambo use in which autopsy revealed underlying heart disease possibly related to reduced myocardial perfusion (Aquila et al., 2018) and delayed kambo related symptoms in a 24-year-old woman 22 hours after the ritual (Li et al., 2018)") and cited what I thought the source said rather than what it actually said. Thank you for catching my mistake. This is one of the things I really like about Wikipedia; not making mistakes, but having them corrected.

Your edit was probably reverted because you are a brand-new editor and you didn't give a reason for your edit in the "Edit summary" field; if you'd added "not in source" to the edit summary, the reverter probably would have checked and seen you were right (you can see all the edit summaries for a page in the "history" tab). Sadly, the volunteers cleaning up vandalism on Wikipedia see a lot of new editors who removed content without giving a reason, and most of them are vandals; the reversion of your edit was a false positive. I hope you won't let this somewhat odd first editing experience discourage you; please post to the Teahouse (or my talk page if I'm around) if you have any questions. HLHJ (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)