User talk:Migcluc123

May 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Low level programming language constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 08:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

🇵🇰

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to User:Donner60, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Howicus with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Donner60 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Donner60, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 01:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Closedmouth (talk) 11:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)