User talk:Mighty Antar

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Basingstoke
Regarding this edit to Basingstoke &mdash; thank you for your contributions, but please note internal links (where appropriate) are far better than external ones. Thus, I've reverted your change, and kept Festival Place and Basingstoke Town F.C. as internal, rather than external links. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Warning Users
Hi you recently added a few warning to User:Viddin's userpage, these warning are intened to be put on user's talk pages not their user page. If you could keep that in mind when warning users, that would be great! --Lwa r f  Talk! 01:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Spectre (Monster in My Pocket)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Spectre (Monster in My Pocket), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Spectre (Monster in My Pocket) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: non-notable thing To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Spectre (Monster in My Pocket), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Spectre (Monster in My Pocket) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Spectre (Monster in My Pocket)
I've nominated Spectre (Monster in My Pocket), an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Spectre (Monster in My Pocket) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Spectre (Monster in My Pocket) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Spectre (Monster in My Pocket) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Kwsn (Ni!) 01:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Glenrothes
Hi, thanks for reviewing the Glenrothes article, and i'm glad you liked it. Everyone who has contributed to it has done a great job.

I was just wondering how I can go about getting its grading up from a B? I was expecting it to go up once it had been reviewed?

Mcwesty 17:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Slot Car/Tether Car edits
Hi, Antar. Thanks for the welcome to Wikipedia, but it's really just me, David (D.Helber) who made the tether-car edits to Slot Car. I forgot to log in, so it looked like a new user.

Prior to making that edit, I had been reading a bit about early model car racing history, and also found the Tether Car entry. I noticed that the author had dated the I.C. car racing on tethers to the late '20s. Not knowing much about the gas engine side of the hobby, I figured he was more likely to be right than I was when I said "From the 1930s..." in Slot Cars, so I changed the date. As you say, though, his assertion is unsourced. Hertz says "gasoline [sic] powered cars ... originated in the late 1930's," so I'm happy to go with that. Thanks for the wiser analysis.

I can't quite agree that tether cars are not an antecedent to slot-racing merely because the Lionel cars preceded them. If that's valid, we might as well leave out the IC rail cars and the '50s electric rail-cars also. As a part of the gas-car/rail-car hobby, the tether car is part of the mainstream progression from uncontrolled to driver-controlled hobby racing. The Lionel cars, on the other hand were something of a dead-end anomaly, a mere foreshadowing. I think it is worth leaving the Tether Car link in both the body text and (at very least) the links. It is one of the few hobby-car-racing entries in Wikipedia, and will likely improve in quality in the same way Slot Car has. Perhaps our link will help speed that evolution by bringing it to the attention of more people.

One of the problems in discussing the IC cars is knowing what they burned and when. Some people describe them as diesels. Did any of the early ones actually burn diesel fuel, or is that just a verbal approximation for "methanol-fueled glow plug engines"? Those might be considered an exotic sort of diesel since they use self-sustained heat (in the glowplugs) instead of spark, though not the heat of compression like a true diesel. Hertz refers to the entire class as "gasoline-powered." Apparently some common earlier versions actually burned gasoline and used spark-ignition, though I can't at the moment come up with a source for that recently-read and multiply-encountered assertion.

Another problem for me is the tether-car/rail-car relationship. I originally presumed tether car IC racing, because it is simpler, had preceded rail-car IC racing and had largely been supplanted by it. Now thanks to [this 1940 article] I'm not sure at all. I have an old book coming in the mail that may shed some light on that. Or perhaps you already know the answers. This book would have the answers, but I'm not up for a $300 expenditure at the moment. However, do check their History page for a great pic of tether racing in 1939, so maybe my presumed chronology was correct after all, if not my assumption of the supplanting of tether by rail.

More in followup entry.

D.Helber 17:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Since you and I seem to be, for better or worse, the guardians of the Wiki Slot Car entry (and a pretty good team we seem to make, if I might say so), let me propose the following edit:

''By the 1930s, serious craftsmen/hobbyists were racing model cars powered by small internal combustion engines, some with spark-ignition, but more often with glow plug engines. For guidance, the cars were clamped to a single center rail, or tethered to the center of a circular track. There was no driver control of the car, so it was largely a mechanic's hobby.'' (Then the existing Hertz reference.)

Note that "time of origin question" is dodged by the phrase "By the 1930's." I also tap-dance around the question of gasoline vs. methanol in the early examples. Let me know what you think, and we can work it out rather than reverting edits.

On a related subject, you may enjoy some of the recent threads in Slot Forum International's History and Culture forum, about rail cars and rail car tracks (mostly electric) in the Fifties. Check the 'London 1952 Exhibition,' 'Rail Racing,' 'Remember This,' and 'Cheddar' threads. The 'BAPOM' thread was an eye-opener on a different subject. In the 'SCX/Scalextric' thread there's a great Scalextric family-tree/timeline graphic.

Glad I've finally learned (from your message) how to talk to you directly and off the article's discussion page). Thanks.

Cheers, David

D.Helber 17:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Slipknot GAC
Recently you failed the article Slipknot (band) as a good article, I was wondering if you could post a review or explain how this article failed so I or somebody else can improve on the article. (Rezter 18:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC))

Slot Car comments
Antar, I got my book, Dempewolff's "Table Top Racing", 1963. A beautiful copy for $11 plus postage. It had lots of info on the electric rail-racing era, but less than I had hoped on the gas-cars. Using it and some web sources, I added some detail concerning the infancy of tabletop racing to SLOT CAR. Then I went back and added a bit of detail to the gas-car part to balance.

The problem is that, with the rewrite, I'm not entirely sure that some of your sources remain correctly attached to the specific information that you intended them to illustrate (since I don't have those publications to look at). Please check the new wording for me, to be sure that they still match up, and fix any problems. We may now be a bit over-sourced in that section, considering the relative scarcity of footnotes in later sections.

I have sent the original author of TETHER CAR a note asking for sourced verification of the 1920s-30s claim, but the more I read, the more I am convinced that it was just a fudged guess, and there was no significant gas-car activity prior to about 1936. If I don't get anything solid soon, I think I'll amend both articles to read "late 1930s".

As a side note, I was amused to find this ironic verification cementing the link between gas-car rail-racing and slot cars. "In 1954 the Southport Model Engineering Society (SMES) used a portable diesel rail car track as part of their annual exhibition to raise funds for the society. Alban Adams felt quite rightly that this breached his patent on the guides on their cars as he had made it clear that any club using this system for commercial use had to pay a portion of their profits to him as a royalty, and threatened legal action against the society if they continued to use a diesel rail track for the 1955 exhibition. This forced the society to look for a replacement model racing car attraction. The solution to their problem was an electric rail racing system inspired by the discussions in the recent edition of Model Maker. And so, electric rail racing came to be in this country. This eventually led to slot racing, so Alban Adams was right after all - albeit indirectly." It's from http://www.ddavid.com/slot-car-gallery/passion.htm, quoting J.R. Davies.

It was just too good not to use in our SLOT CAR entry, even though it takes a lot of words and clunkifies the flow a bit.

-- David D.Helber 16:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Anglewinder, Sidewinder, Pancake motors - and Slot Car Mfgs. List
Antar, Since it looked like SLOT CAR was stuck linked to that sad and inaccurate Anglewinder entry, I redid ANGLEWINDER, and added SIDEWINDER (SLOT CAR) and PANCAKE (SLOT CAR) entries. Haven't done INLINE yet, but soon. Also did two illustrations to use in all the motor-style entries. One has a glitch in the pancake part - the crown gear jumped up above the pinion drive gear. I'll correct it.

Please check the PANCAKE (SLOT CAR) entry for me and see if you can figure out why my source numbers are goobered up, and why the source list doesn't show up at the bottom of the article.

Thanks for your help.

Now, what can we do with that pointless GOOP entry?

SLOT CAR - I added a few manufacturers' names. Manufacturers' lists are a bit of a problem. HO SCALE had one that was very incomplete, even for the significant manufacturers, but long nonetheless. I broke it up into Current Mfgs. and Mfgs. No Longer Active in HO. I'm getting to be quite a Wiki busybody. Breaking up a long list makes it more readable but it's still a bit irritating to the reader who has to scan down several screens worth of company names to make it to the external links. I haven't come up with a good solution - maybe double columns (can you do tables in Wikipedia? I'll have to check.) Cheers--

-- David - D.Helber 05:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

SLOT CAR - Need Help with New Illustration
Hi, Antar - Upgrading SLOT CAR's neglected aft-section. I did an illustration for 'Electrical', but it got a bit out of hand. Could you please take a look and give me some feedback. It's at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SlotControllers.gif

It'll appear about 67% of full size in the article. Caption to read something like: Types of Slot Car Controllers Telegraph Key, c. 1955- used by the earliest rail-car clubs. On/Off only. Thumb button, c. 1959 - In early sets. On/Off, or Fast/Slow/Off. Wheel/Knob Rheostat, c. 1960 - Full speed range. Can be set for constant speed. Carbon Disc Plunger c. 1963 - Aurora. Full range, but uncomfortable.. Rheostat Plunger - c.1964 onward. With or without brakes. Full Grip Style - c.1962. Marx set controller. A precursor of pistolgrip styles. Pistolgrip or Russkit type Rheostat - c. 1965 onward. With or without brakes Electronic Controller, 1975 onward - multiple features, adjustable ohm rating.

Long caption. I'll add a bit on controller design in the body text so the image doesn't overpower the text. Thanks for any comments on the image/caption. Several of the dates are guesses. When did that Cox/Strombecker ventilated style plunger rheo come on the market? I know the simple cylinder plunger predated it, and probably the Scalextric flat ventilated plunger, but when? Also, no idea when practical electronic controllers arrived, 1975 is a guess. The thumb-clicker is a Revell, who marketed Scalextric in the US. Was it also the early Scalextric controller? Maybe ought to axe the stoopid Marx gripper and add a Ninco or Scallextric digital. Any help appreciated. Thanks. -- David (D.Helber 03:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC))

-- Thanks so much, Mighty A -- I must say, I envy your reference library. And your knowledge of the bigger slots - I'm pretty much an HO guy.

I was so tickled when I saw the telegraph key mentioned and illustrated in the "Built with Passion" book ad, http://www.vsrnonline.com/RailRacing/BuiltWithPassion.html and http://www.ddavid.com/slot-car-gallery/passion.htm. I just had to get it into SLOT CAR, somehow. The Electrical section needed an illustration - et voila! Now I'm wondering how serious the reference is. I wish I had Laidlaw-Dickson's Rail Car book, but the best price I've found is thirty dollars, which seems to me like a lot just to clarify points on fifty-year-old toy technology.

Your first reply sent me through my collection of sources. Somewhere I remember reading that this Revell controller had a Full/Half/Off configuration, but two of my books show that it is clearly the mysterioso "vibrator" variable controller abused by the Old Weird Herald (still can only guess at how it worked). I've searched through my American books and all over the web for a picture of the early Scalextric on/off thumb clicker - nada. If you know where there is an image of one, could you send me the URL? I'd like to replace the Revell buzzer with a drawing of it. There used to be a site which had extensive images of early Scalextric catalogue pages, but it seems to be gone now. Hertz is inexplicably silent on the subject of Scalextric in all areas.

Aurora absorbed Russkit (or at least hired Jim Russell) and used a dark blue version of the Russkit-style controller to replace the carbon-disk thumbbusters in T-jet sets in 1969, and a golden-yellow or orange version with AFX. That's the one I illustrated - its cheerful color and horizontal slots make a visual change from the purple Parma-style electronic controller. Really ought to have a K&B style horizontal thumb-plunger, too, but the picture is already threatening to overpower the text in that section. Besides, they look so 'Rube Goldberg' and uncomfortable (at least for a short-thumbed person like myself). Thanks again for all your wise counsel. -- David (D.Helber 05:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC))

Jim Clark
Don't bother trying to talk to him - it's Pflanzgarten -- Ian Dalziel 18:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jim Morrison photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jim Morrison photo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Bobbi-Kar/Airway conflicts
Hello, thank you for pointing out the disturbing similarities between these two articles. I will look into whether they are, indeed, the same article next time I have my hands on the book I got the info from. Thank you again, and happy editing. -Belvyzep Belvyzep 07:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Taxi Driver
Hello, regarding this edit of mine, where I undid your edit, it was a mistake - due to the way the diff was formatted I thought you had removed a large portion of the text while in reality it was just moved down. Sorry for the inconvenience. Micha&amp;#322; Kosmulski (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Humorous
PLEASE look it up! I really am spelling it correctly! Even in British English. Stephenb (Talk) 10:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The page you cite is wrong, or lists an unusual spelling. Please, look it up! Try  or  Stephenb (Talk) 10:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Incidentally, I have corrected the page you cited - it is most definitely wrong. Looking at the history, a user added it because there was an entry here, though mistakenly added it as a UK spelling despite the dictionary link it gives is Princeton's, with no indication of usage. I have changed it to read "unusual" instead of "UK". I have also rechecked with a dictionary (the New Oxford) we have here in the office. Stephenb (Talk) 10:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I shall revert no changes. The Oxford dictionary may list it, but I bet it doesn't say that it is the correct or, indeed, usual spelling. Check American and British English spelling differences as well as User:Roger Davies/Sandbox1 and the discussion at User talk:Spellmaster.   I also don't appreciate your use of "Yawn" - please keep the discussion civil rather than suggesting you are bored. Once again, I implore you to check for the proper English spelling.  I corrected the spelling on the page because it was poorly spelt - whether or not it was a red link is immaterial (if you check the, link for humourous and humorous both redirect correctly to humour and so should not be taken as an indication of correct sspelling) Stephenb (Talk) 11:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

If you really take the trouble to read those articles, you will realise you are, in fact, wrong. I don't think you've actually read them have you? In all cases, where people have tried to claim your spelling is an alternative, their arguments have been rebutted and the correct spelling was pointed out. Or, if you have read them, you are attempting to wind me up! If so, please stop. As it is, I will leave it there. Stephenb (Talk) 19:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Look before accusing
I have posted my rationale for my edit to the Apocalypto article in the "talk" section. You accused me of not doing so in your "edit comments", and furthered this accusation in sending me a message. Although I am new to wikipedia and do not know how to perform certain functions (such as posting my reasons for the edit directly in my edit itself) I would think that any responsible person would've looked to the article discussion before thoughtlessly reverting back to the prior version. If, however, being familiar with the intricacies of wikipedia (as you seem to be) you simply decided to ignore my concerns with the article, then you need to be reported.

I have two suggestions for you:

A) Present your VALID contention in the talk page, and we can sort it out in an educated fashion (deciding the matter on the basis of popular consensus if need be), rather than you just rashly deleting my edits.

Or

B) If you lack any material objections, then revert back to my edit until you can come up with some, seeing as (for the time being at least) I am the only one justified in my editing actions.

and also, please, in the future, refrain from deleting my posts in an attempt, I must assume, at saying that I did not adequately justify my edit.

Here is a definition of plot from wikipedia for you, so it should be useful and applicable:

Story arc Plot is often schematically represented as an arc reflecting the rising action described in the following phases: Initial situation – the beginning. It is the first incident that makes the story start. Conflict or Problem – goal which the main character, or other characters, of the story has to achieve. Complication or Rising action – obstacles which the main character has to cope. Climax – highest point of interest of the story. Dénouement or Resolution – what happens to the character after overcoming all obstacles and reaching his goal, or failing to achieve the desired result and not reaching his goal. Conclusion – the end result

Using the interpretation of plot provided for us by a sanctioned wikipedia article, it is easy to see that plot is not inclusive of a quote which has no actual relevance to the action or substance of a film. If you would like to add another section, that would be wonderful, but as of now, this is irrelevant and must be deleted.

P.S. please actually read my post before ignoring it, and afterwards, don't delete half of it.

Thanks, Jarrodca —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarrodca (talk • contribs) 18:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Ghost
I'm not sure why you put those words back in. None of the applicable definitions of ghost give reason for them. Do you think the article needs re-naming or something? —— Martinphi   ☎ Ψ Φ —— 01:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I would call that good reason to rename, or redo the summary to be more inclusive, not to put in those words in particular. Yes, it's said to be that, but other things as well.  So we need to take those words out and expand the definition.  —— Martinphi    ☎ Ψ Φ —— 02:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Actionbiker game cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Actionbiker game cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Automobile conversion templates
It seemed like a good idea at the time. The auto mph template has been deprecated, there is no real need to change them but such as task is quite easy. As for the Auto conversion templates being recommended by the auto project, it should note that auto mph shouldn't be used. It is a bit odd that auto mph is the only one to be deprecated. Jbattersby (talk) 11:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Anauroch.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Anauroch.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gavin Collins (talk) 08:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

CompScientist socks
I'd put those on the SSP page. Meantime, I'll block them. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Andrea Bocelli
Hi just wanted to say thanks for your message on the talk page as I have found it very helpful in my "quest" to improve the article this weekend!I am trying to balance it all out so that the criticism section is expanded upon, not just for the purpose of criticism, but to simply show that there is criticism from some quarters of the opera world, explain something about why that is and who these critics are. So as to give more of a background to it to those who know little. It does seem that recently on the article a number of users have added "critical material" (for want of a far better experession") some of which has been unsourced and others which whilst sourced, have not really fully explained the criticism. If that makes any sense at all. When I have finished as much as I can, I wonder if you would do me the favour of checking it for me please to see if I get it as balanced as possible? Thanks. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 23:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi thanks for your message. No worries to be honest whilst I made a point of mentioning the criticism section, I am actually working on the article as a whole, with that particular section being one part of it and as you say it does need to be "countered" with the praise of millions of people - especially when the critics probably number a tiny percentage in comparison which is one of the reasons why I wanted to do all this! Such fun. I've made a start already with trying to add more bio stuff to the article. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 01:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Asilkaan2004.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Asilkaan2004.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Bkell (talk) 09:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Riga 1941 Nazi Welcome.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Riga 1941 Nazi Welcome.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

cfd category:supercars
hello, I've noticed that you've initiated the discussion about car classifications on WP:CAR. Maybe you would like to participate in this discussion as well: Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_February_4. regards--79.212.225.247 (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Andy Griffith1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Andy Griffith1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Informing you
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Deletion of selected recordings box on Madame Butterfly article
Please look at the TALK PAGE and lay out your reasoning rather than just reverting. - Jay (talk) 04:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of supercar article
Please look at the TALK PAGE and lay out your reasoning rather than just reverting. - 206.125.176.3 (talk) 19:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

MigrationWatch UK
Hello Mighty Antar. I hope there will be a chance to restore balance to this article. I have suggested to the editors at WP:COIN that semi-protection ought to be considered. As we try to make that article neutral, I hope the term 'right wing' will be carefully scrutinized. It's not up to Wikipedia editors to determine that something is right wing, though we could report the opinions of journalists who use that term. Notice that even this article in the Independent talks about a 'right-wing agenda' in their headine but they don't use that adjective on MigrationWatch itself. One of your versions of the article has this in the lead: MigrationWatch UK is an independent right wing[1][2][3] pressure group and think tank which recognises the value of limited migration in both directions as a natural part of an open economy. I think that would have to be tweaked, since I'd rather not qualify them as 'right wing' in Wikipedia's own words, though it might take some thought how best to do it. EdJohnston (talk) 04:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anauroch.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Anauroch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Mary Webb
An IP has reverted my contribution to this page several times without discussion or explanation. When you originally removed my reference to Stella Gibbons you made several very valuable critisms of it, which I sought to address - most obviously by providing a source that Webb was the target, as you had requested. So I would be interested in your reaction to the censorship of what I hope is now an encyclopedic entry, or if you still have issues with it, before I request protection of the page, which I hope you would support. Straw Cat (talk) 14:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Nessun Dorma
E pur si muove ? :-) Bob aka Linuxlad (talk) 15:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Incipit and Title
These are two absolutely different concepts. In particular, in the opera field, arias haven't titles, but only incipit (with very rare exceptions of unoriginal titles, like "Lamento di Federico"). Lieder or "romanze da camera" can have titles (ex: Sole e amore). --Al Pereira(talk) 03:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Semi-prot
Hello Mighty Antar. I've semi-protected your Talk for one week after seeing your comment on my Talk page. Let me know if the protection should be adjusted. EdJohnston (talk) 18:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * A month of semi-prot on your user page as well. Contact me if you want any changes, or ask at WP:RFPP. EdJohnston (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Local police nissan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Local police nissan.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Halo vehicle
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Halo vehicle. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Halo vehicle. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Andover
I am interested to know why you reverted this edit, particularly as there was no band called that, and no hits produced by them. The insertion of the "information" appears to be drunken Xmas party vandalism from TSB; if you disagree, I would be keen to see your sources. Keristrasza (talk) 15:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You have again added this: "Darren Collicott rose to fame during the early nineties releasing a string of hit singles with his band The Reindeer Fisters. Although controversial, their songs inspired a generation. He is now senior director of the world renowned brand Fistee Magee, whose products continue to revolutionise the masculine hygiene industry," claiming in your edit summary that you are "removing unsourced vandalism." Please explain. Keristrasza (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Must read article before I revert, Must read article before I revert Your recent edit  appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.Mighty Antar (talk) 17:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there Mighty Antar, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Mighty Antar/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of images removed today here


 * Shut off the bot here


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  03:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Reincarnation research
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Reincarnation research. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Reincarnation research. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

TfD of Template:Automobile classification
I didn't think it was particularly ingenuous of you to nominate this for deletion, and then within minutes start removing it from the articles where it appears, so that it suddenly fulfilled criteria #4 of TfD where it did not previously. While I understand your motivations, I think it's best that such editorial decisions and deletion nominations are kept separate in the interests of fairness and transparency. I've restored the template to the articles concerned for the time being. Regards, --DeLarge (talk) 10:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I've no idea what you're talking about. Please read WP:V which means I'm perfectly at liberty to remove material like this which does not have a reliable source. This material is content masquerading as a template.Mighty Antar (talk) 19:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on BBC. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 17:43, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Mainly because you had reverted three times in 24 hours, though he probably deserves one as well. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 00:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Basingstoke and Deane
Hi Antar. Thanks for your note. I have replied on my Talk page. Skinsmoke (talk) 20:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your added refs to Roger McGough. Span (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Honda RC series


The article Honda RC series has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Opening statement "Although there is, strictly speaking, no Honda RC Series" makes it unlikely the term could ever meet WP:N or WP:V. A search for references found web hits, but no published (gBooks) that meetWP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

the goop page that is linked off the slot car page
i think this should be deleted as it has no real use and is not very informative, do you back me up, just tell me on my talkpage if I should nominate it for deletion. I can create a new section in the slot car section for goop as a slot car liquid if you don't mind, i'm also the user behind the list of slot cars in movies and TV. Much research went into it off forums. — Preceding unsigned Seasider91 (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Brütsch Mopetta.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brütsch Mopetta.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Giggles
Ok, yes, I may have vandalised the Kingsclere page, but you didn't remove the addition above it to the article that provoked my vandalism. Does that make sense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.26.97 (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Your recent addition to Physical disability
I have a bit of a problem with the material you added. Firstly it is applicable to Disability (as a whole) and not only to Physical disability which is only one "sub-category". Secondly the distinction the document you quoted makes between "disability" and "handicap" seems to me to be based mostly on political correctness. Such a distinction is not generally made in the ordinary English as spoken around the world. My impression is that in North America the terms are in fact regarded as completely synonymous. In other countries such as the UK and South Africa the word "handicap" is in fact quite widely deprecated and not used except as a deliberate insult. The document appears to be attempting to be prescriptive rather than descriptive of the terminology. I think it is much more suited to the Disability article and specifically in the a section on terminology. Roger (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Witchcraft
Hi there, your recent edit said in the edit summary it was removing unsourced material - when there were clearly several sources in what you deleted. Please could we discuss this on the article talk page? Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk)  06:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Sliding pillar suspension
Do you have any more details on sliding pillar being used for rear suspension ? Apart from motorbikes and "plunger" suspensions, I've never heard of this. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Comparethemarket.com
Hi there - I'm not sure the Martin Lewis moneysavingexperrt article you're linking to does justify the statement that Comparethemarket.com misses insurers listed on other sites. He says in his own article that the order of comparison sites listed is based on who delivered the cheapest quote most often and also from moneysavingexperrt user feedback. This is not the same as having most brands - if it were tescocompare would not feature anywhere on his list as they have the smallest panel out of all the comparison sites listed.

Equally, Comparethemarket does not exist solely to offer a white label comparison service for other companies - it is first and foremost it is a price comparison site for its own customers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmtpin (talk • contribs) 01:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Ken Livingstone
I would support your edit if you simply drop "widely" which seems the bone of contention here. Best Wishes 'Ankh '.Morpork  11:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

list of fastest brrrm brrms
I agree that in an ideal world the list would not mention records set by modified cars. BUT including them prevents endless edit warring when someone reads that the SL300 was good for 140 mph, when they know they read on the internet that one did 150 mph. etc. So mentioning that specific occurrence defuses the passion. Least worst option and all that. Greglocock (talk) 00:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

slot car racing page
The ISRA rankings table is a bit messed up (reads accross instead of down, entirely my fault) can you help the page by fixing it please.Seasider91 (talk) 19:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. When you recently edited Warminster Journal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

The Offence
You may be interested to know that the source you have priorly requested for the article The Offence has now been provided on the article's talkpage. --87.151.31.171 (talk) 03:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Inline-twin engine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inline-twin engine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Inline-twin engine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

The Butler did it
If you've got more info on Nick Butler (besides his website), it would be appreciated here & here (& wouldn't be out of place here, either ;p). TREKphiler  any time you're ready, Uhura  22:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. When you recently edited Sidecar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steib (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Spirits needs you!
Hello,

You're recieving this message as a contributor to WikiProject Spirits in the past. Currently many members work solo and articles that interest themselves, we'd like to pull the Spirits group together to allow us to raise the overall quality of articles under our banner. If you're still active on Wikipedia and keen on contributing to WikiProject Spirits, head over to the talk page and lend your voice to the discussion. Cabe 6403  (Talk•Sign) 14:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Merc'd for death
Sorry to hear it. Any chance of it being uploaded again, so we can use it? Also, have you seen anything that would clear up the confusion over the amount of chop?  TREK philer any time you're ready, Uhura 22:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Felber brochure.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Felber brochure.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

WP:TOC and Bond Minicar
WP:TOC make it very clear that there should be no content at all between the TOC and first header. The reason for this is that anyone reading the article with a screen reader (ie blind person) will miss out on text. With your placement of the TOC, any blind user will not read seven paragraphs of the article. Any text between the TOC and header will not be read. To quote WP:TOC, "Users of screen readers do not expect any text between the TOC and the first heading." From WP:Lead, "Users of screen readers expect the table of contents to follow the introductory text; they will also miss any text placed between the TOC and the first heading.". Also see User talk:Bgwhite for more explanation.

The lead section is followed by a section heading, not seven more paragraphs of text. WP:Lead explains what is a lead, "... introductory text, and table of contents, moving to the heading of the first section." Bgwhite (talk) 21:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Basingstoke/GA1
Hi. I've opened a GAR on the Basingstoke article for which you are one of the main contributors. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding sourcing, prose, and several MoS issues, see Talk:Basingstoke/GA1 for more details.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  16:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

WP:BNA access query
Hey Mighty Antar, one more query at BNA

Disambiguation link notification for July 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talking Books. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620124855 your edit] to Mitsuoka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * *Microcar K-2 based on the design of the FMR Tg500

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=631201796 your edit] to Tom Phillis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * In 1961, he won Honda's first championship race when he took the 1961 125cc [[Spanish motorcycle Grand Prix|Spanish Grand

Straw Poll
There is a straw poll that may interest you regarding the proper use of "Religion =" in infoboxes of atheists.

The straw poll is at Template talk:Infobox person.

--Guy Macon (talk) 09:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Symes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

Corbyn
Sorry for the revert -- I hope you can see what I mean about the talk page. I agree with your last edit summary, saying there's no consensus for the pic -- this was my point a couple of days ago, there seems to be no consensus for *any* pic at this stage. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jeremy Corbyn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You have reverted the article to using a main image, that there is overwhelming consensus against using, seven times now. Please stop. JJARichardson (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Nashville ARCA 150) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nashville ARCA 150, Mighty Antar!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Some commentary on the lone event would be nice, but the article is in no danger of deletion."

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (talk) 17:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Love the username
My lad is a REME officer. Guy (help! - typo?) 18:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Basingstoke
Basingstoke has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)