User talk:Mightybear17/be bold

Think back to how to evaluate an article. Look at the article's content, tone, and sourcing.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Are some areas under- or over-developed?
 * The article's content is relevant but needs to be more specific very broad. Most of the areas in the writing are under-developed.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The written is neutral.
 * Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable?
 * It only has two citations it is not enough citations. The citations are not reliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * It is underrepresented.

What can you add? Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page.

More reliable sources. Mightybear17 (talk) 04:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)