User talk:Miguel Gaudencio

November 2013
Hello, Miguel Gaudencio. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Desire for Beauty (2013 film)
Hello Miguel Gaudencio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Desire for Beauty (2013 film) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Reply to email
The article was deleted for the actual text of the article, and nothing to do with piracy. The language on the page was almost a word for word copy of the description on the YouTube video, which violates our terms for copyrighted work. We have a rather strict policy with regards to this sort of material being used. As you admit to being the director, you also have a conflict of interest, which needs to be addressed.

Recreating the article I wouldn't necessarily be against, but the actual article needs to be written independently from any source, and not taken word for word. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

your email
Thank you for your email. I will not respond per email (as explained here), but I'm happy to respond in this thread if you like. I do think that has already addressed your concerns. All the best, Mduvekot (talk) 16:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * As I explained to you earlier, I will not respond to you via email. I have now disabled email from other users. If you have any concerns about my involvement with a page you created, you can raise those here or on my talk page. Mduvekot (talk) 17:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)