User talk:Miguelzinho

Lusophobia and 'advertence'
Firstly, the fact that a link is included to what is a racist website does not mean that I or any other user condones racism, be it anti-Portuguese or otherwise. It is simply to provide a reference and evidence that it exists. If I were editing the page about Holocaust denial, I would use links to equally objectionable websites to show that Holocaust denial exists.

The English word you are looking for is not 'advertence', it is 'warning' or 'caution'. Just as actual in English does not mean what it means in Portuguese, advertence does not mean what 'advertência' means in Portuguese. For some reason, there is a problem with the rest of the article being displayed, but I will try and fix it.Quiensabe 05:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)



Reply: "advertence" means "attention". I didn't write "warning" or "caution" because these two words are not as neutral as "attention" is. When you say "warning/caution", you are stating a point of view, when you say "attention", you just want to appeal for the reader's critical sense. Advertence is an English word and, on the contrary to what you said, I didn't invent it.

\Ad*vert"ence\, Advertency \Ad*vert"en*cy\, [OF. advertence, avertence, LL. advertentia, fr. L. advertens. See {Advertent}.] The act of adverting, of the quality of being advertent; attention; notice; regard; heedfulness.

Main Entry: ad·ver·tence Pronunciation: \ad-ˈvər-tən(t)s\ Function: noun Date: 14th century 1 : the action or process of adverting : attention 2 : advertency

Noun: advertence The process of being heedful - advertency Derived forms: advertences See also: advert, advertent Type of: attentiveness, heed, paying attention, regard

Noun advertence has 1 sense advertence, advertency - the process of being heedful --1 is a kind of attentiveness, heed, regard, paying attention Derived form: verb advert1

The racist website is not only racist (obviously, the website's creators have the right to show their thoughts, feelings, and beliefs), violating the neutral point of view policy of an encyclopedic reference but also has dozens of factual and historical inaccuracies which is the worst flaw of all. Miguelzinho 19:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Emanuel (singer)
I have nominated Emanuel (singer), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Emanuel (singer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. emerson7 05:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC) emerson7 05:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Miguelzinho! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Eduardo Souto de Moura -

Proposed deletion of A Cabra


The article A Cabra has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Student newspaper. Page makes no attempt to provide secondary sources or make a claim of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 05:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anjos


A tag has been placed on Anjos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Victão Lopes I hear you... 23:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Diário Digital


The article Diário Digital has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable online newspaper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Egoli Consolidated Mines Ltd


A tag has been placed on Egoli Consolidated Mines Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC)