User talk:Mihai.mihaila

Welcome!

Hello, Mihai.mihaila, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vfolio, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Meph talk 10:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Vfolio


A tag has been placed on Vfolio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Meph talk 10:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vfoliolite


A tag has been placed on Vfoliolite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Meph talk 10:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Vfoliolite
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Vfoliolite, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vfolio


A tag has been placed on Vfolio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Meph talk 11:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Mihai.mihaila for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Meph talk 11:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, WikipediaRecommenderSystem


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, WikipediaRecommenderSystem. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - WikiTrust. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at WikiTrust - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Meph talk 11:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Bot?
Hi. I'm not sure what you're up to, but your edits on Wikipedia are becoming disruptive. Are you building some sort of Wiki scraper or something? Surely that's what this Wiki Recommender System is. Anyway, you can't just create a half a dozen accounts and use them for testing without listing it or something. I'm blocking your account and all of your subaccounts for now, but if you'd like to explain what's actually going on, feel free to explain it here, or email me or something. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The accounts were manually created and they are used for building the development of Wikipedia Recommender System (WRS)
 * The page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikipediaRecommenderSystem will track the development of the system


 * Wikipedia Recommender System is the subject of my master thesis which I am currently developing.
 * The system does not create any content automatically - it is not a bot.
 * The purpose of the system is to investigate ways of rating Wikipedia pages and to present to its users with a relevant rating.


 * I built the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikipediaRecommenderSystem and edited it with different accounts as I am currently investigating the benefits of using WikiTrust user ratings for improving the WRS. In order to do so I need to have contributed to some pages. In order not to create bad content for other wiki pages, I just want to test the system on this page.


 * Can you enable my accounts as I will modify the page to contain a elaborate description of the system.


 * The current user accounts I am using are:
 * mihai.mihaila (my own account)
 * and
 * wrsuser1
 * wrsuser2
 * wrsuser3
 * wrsuser4
 * wrsuser5
 * for development purposes.


 * I want to underline one more time that these accounts will not create any other sort of content on other pages, and they are manually controlled by me.


 * Thank you in advance,
 * Mihai


 * First off, the article on this thing you've created is unacceptable, as it doesn't meet notability criteria, among other issues. But this is a strange set of circumstances, so I've opened a thread at the administrators' noticeboard for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Mihai, if you're not already aware of research policies and projects on Wikipedia, you may want to look at the meta wiki article, covering research across the wikis, and the Wikipedia research WikiProject. Meph talk 15:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Unblocked
Following the small discussion at ANI, I've unblocked your account and all the Wrs accounts. Here are the following stipulations that I'd like you to follow: Does this make sense? If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Stop posting edits to User:Recommendations/Cardinal (bird) and so on. If you want to test, do them in your userspace. One example of this would be User:Mihai.mihalia/Cardinal (bird).
 * Speaking of userspace, I've moved the text you added to WikipediaRecommenderSystem to User:Mihai.mihaila/WikipediaRecommenderSystem. Your system is not notable enough on its own, but if you want to have the text as a subpage, that's fine.
 * Update each of the Wrs accounts' user pages (User:Wrsuser1, etc) with a note saying that they are a legitimate account of yours and are being used solely for research purposes. You should also update your userpage to describe the sort of work you're doing, so that this doesn't come up again.
 * Per Meph's talk above, you should probably post at WikiProject Research and explain what's going on.

Thank you for your understanding. I will follow your indications.