User talk:Mihail Al. Mihaylov

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Mihail Al. Mihaylov, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Pope Stephen V seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cakelot1 (talk) 16:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Cakelot1! Thank you for writing to me. Thank you for the recommendations that would have been useful to me many years ago, in the early stages of my work on Wikipedia. I wish you fruitful work in Wikipedia, constructive and creative style! Let our articles be a source of rich information and create complete information for the mass consumer! Mihail Al. Mihaylov (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Your recent editing history at List of Liverpool F.C. players shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Please do not change the layout of a page without editorial consensus. If you disagree start a discussion on the article talk page.'' Blue Riband► 18:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Apparently you don't want the article to be better, but to remain shoddy and ugly as it was! As you do not want to objectively evaluate the positive changes in the article (and they are obvious) and the work invested in its improvement, it is not worth wasting time with this! Mihail Al. Mihaylov (talk) 19:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at List of Liverpool F.C. players. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. ''If you believe that in its current form the article is "...shoddy and ugly..." please discuss how you propose to improve it on the article Talk page rather than keep reverting it back to the way you think it should be.'' Blue Riband► 19:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg What you write is not true! I do not accept the List of Liverpool F.C. players for my property. You accept it as your property, you return it most recklessly in the ugly form in which it was. And you are not discussing it on any discussion page !? I have explained in detail with each change what improves with it, although this is obvious to anyone who wants to see it. And who does not want and stick to the worse option, does not accept the explanation at all, but just persists! It is clear that it is unnecessary to copy in a page for discussion the explanations of what is written in the article - they are already given in the comments to each of the editors! Mihail Al. Mihaylov (talk) 21:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I have no interest in the List of Liverpool F.C. players but did see an edit war going on mainly between you and . Editors who disagree on content should start a discussion on the talk page here.  Edit summaries are NOT a substitute for discussion.  The talk page should be used so that all of the comments are in one place and not scattered among several talk pages of individual editors.
 * Wikipedia is built on editorial collaboration and consensus. Calling the work of earlier editors as "...shoddy and ugly..." can hardly be consensus building.  Everyone is welcome to make constructive edits on Wikipedia. Blue Riband► 21:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)