User talk:Mihran H Kalaydjian

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mihran H Kalaydjian


A tag has been placed on User:Mihran H Kalaydjian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Promotional editing
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising.
 * While I do appreciate that you've been keeping this on your userpage, Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself akin to WP:LINKEDIN. If you continue to try to use this as such then you run the risk of getting permanently blocked from editing. This is your last warning.

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have given you at least two warnings not to use your userpage as a Linkedin/promotional page. You have ignored each warning, so I have to assume that your only reason for editing Wikipedia is to promote yourself and I have blocked you accordingly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

I totally understand all the terms and requirements, I will insure you to follow all the guidelines. It will not happen again and I will respect the protocol and every policy. I appreciate if you unlock. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihran H Kalaydjian (talk • contribs)


 * Can you tell me exactly why you were blocked and why your edits were problematic? (I need to know that you completely understand why you were blocked.) Also, can you tell me what you will do if you are unblocked? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I totally and completely understand the requirements and all the guideline, it will not happen again. I appreciate your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihran H Kalaydjian (talk • contribs)


 * I need you to specifically tell me why you were blocked, why you understand that this was wrong, and how you will edit if you are unblocked. You will not be unblocked without specifying this. Just giving a vague promise that you won't do something isn't enough. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I already told you I made a mistake and error. My answer is not vague and very clear. I understand I did wrong and I learned my lesson. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihran H Kalaydjian (talk • contribs)


 * I'm moving your text to where it would be in the conversation so that this is less confusing for other admins coming in here. Basically the issue here is that you repeatedly posted content despite several clear warnings that this was not acceptable and after a warning that doing this again would lead to a block. I'm asking you to tell me exactly what you did wrong because your past actions have shown that you either didn't understand the warnings or worse- didn't care that you were being warned. You blanked the page several times to remove several warnings by different editors. Either way this past behavior gives off the strong impression that if you are unblocked you will just continue to perform the same actions again and again until you are blocked once more. I need you to specifically tell me why I blocked you because I want to know that you fully understand the reason for the block. I also need for you to tell me what you will do if you are unblocked. Do you plan on editing Wikipedia and if so, what will you edit? If you are not planning on editing Wikipedia then there really is no reason for me or for anyone else to unblock you. If you are planning on just editing about yourself then odds are you will not be unblocked. It's extremely heavily discouraged for people to write about themselves on Wikipedia because of the obvious conflict of interest. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Basically, I'm asking you to tell me specifically why you were blocked. You can't just say "I understand" because your past actions have shown that you are either unable or unwilling to follow policy. That does not show me that you understand because if you are unable to explain why you were blocked then that shows that you still do not understand policy. I also have not received an answer as to what you will do if you are unblocked. I'll be very firm on this: I will not unblock you so that you can write about yourself. That is one of the stipulations for your unblock. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I was blocked because I used content from my professional web site that was not expectable, and from previous articles was already mentioned in other links. I will write about myself from my heart and not copy or paste. Thank you for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihran H Kalaydjian (talk • contribs)

I will repeat my answer to you once more, I apologize for my error and my I will not repeat as I didn't understand how this should work the post. I would like to mention this for the last time, I got your message and now I understand. I will not repeat this error. I ask for apology again and again. I like to resolve this matter immediately. I plan to edit with the right and correct information. Trust me, there will be no reason for you to block me. I appreciate your respect and understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihran H Kalaydjian (talk • contribs)


 * That's not exactly correct. You weren't just blocked because you used content from your website. You were blocked because you were promoting yourself on Wikipedia despite repeated requests that you not do this. I've also stated that if you are unblocked you will not be allowed to post content about yourself on Wikipedia. Your statement just now gives off the impression that if you are unblocked you will continue to attempt to add information about yourself to Wikipedia, which still gives off the impression that you really don't understand the reason for your getting blocked. To put it quite simply, Wikipedia is not a platform for you to advertise yourself and self-promotion of any type will not be tolerated. You've had promotional material repeatedly removed from Wikipedia and you've been left several warnings to let you know that this was unacceptable. You clearly received these warnings since you removed them on several occasions. I warned you here that reposting this information would lead to a block from editing. Hours later you reposted promotional content on your userpage despite that very clear warning.
 * Now you're saying that if you are unblocked you will add the "right and correct information", which I assume means that you will continue to try to add information about yourself to Wikipedia- despite my post here that specifically states that one of the conditions of your unblock is that you will not add information about yourself to Wikipedia. At this point I have to assume that you are not here for any other purpose other than self-advertising and that you will continue to ignore the rules in order to accomplish this task. I'm sorry, but I'm not going to unblock you at this rate and it's unlikely that any other editor will unblock you either, as it looks like a reblocking will be inevitable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, please post any responses at the bottom of the page rather than at the top of the section. This helps so it will be more clear for others to follow. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:51, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I ALREADY MENTIONED I AM SORRY I DON'T WHAT ELSE TO SAY - I REALY DON'T KNOW THAN - I ALREAD MENTIONED I LEARNED MY LESSON AND I APOLOGIZED - OK I WILL NOT PROMOTE MYSELF.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihran H Kalaydjian (talk • contribs)


 * That's what you had to say, that you will not write about yourself (and that you understand why it's wrong). — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * What I'm looking for here is for you to tell me what you will do if you are unblocked. I will not unblock you if all that you are intending to do is write about yourself. I'll be very specific here about what I wanted:
 * For you to say that you understood that the reason for your block was that you were repeatedly posting promotional (and copyrighted) content to your userpage despite repeated warnings that this was unacceptable, including one warning that specifically warned you about a block.
 * For you to say that you understand that you will be unable to add information about yourself to Wikipedia in any context. At most you would be only be able to put in a request for a page to be created at Requested_articles/music, but that is the full extent of what you would be allowed to add. I'll even go ahead and add your name there so there will be no reason for you to even do that.
 * For you to say how you would constructively edit Wikipedia when it comes to topics other than yourself. This is necessary because if you are only here to put information about yourself on Wikipedia then there would be no reason for you to be unblocked. Do you plan on editing articles about music? Botany? Books? We need to specifically know how you will constructively help Wikipedia.
 * That is specifically what I wanted to hear and that I have to label each and every point really doesn't show that you truly understand why you were blocked or that you even understand basic policy. Another admin can unblock you, but I'm personally recommending that they not unblock you because a reblock seems like it would be inevitable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I will not write about myself.

I am not going to do anything - I am not going to write about myself or promote or advertise. I said enough, please respect my request.
 * What will you edit about? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I just want to edit and delete what is not necessary. That's all
 * Can you give an example of this? I'm not trying to be overly harsh, I just want to make sure that you genuinely want to edit Wikipedia. We've had several people ask for unblocks and promise that they would edit on other topics, only to resume their former actions shortly after or to just abandon their accounts. If you are unblocked I want to make sure that you are genuine. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:16, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Trust me, I promise. I will deeply and sincerely honor and respect..I swear to you!