User talk:Mij52/Chronological dating

Just completed the Peer Review of Chronological dating. Overall the page is read very readable and comprehensive of the subject, granted that's to be expected since it encompassed quite a bit, including my assigned topic. If there are any improvements that need to be made, the most immediate and necessary would be matching text to citations. Finding a fix for source nine (not to beat a dead horse) would also be good. Maybe if time permits you could add more to the lead section. Other than that it looks good as far as I can tell. NotPaulDirac (talk) 02:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)