User talk:Mijari

Explanation of why File:Sunday afternoon with Lt Pike.jpg, is, in all likelihood, covered under the fair use statutes
This image was included in a blog post published by Bloomberg Businessweek. The author of the post, blogger Mark Gimein, states in the article, "No site seems to cite the original creator of the George Seurat/UC Davis composite (Image: Sunday afternoon with Lt Pike.jpg). We’re hoping he or she will step forward to get credit."

Many of the these images have been created since the UC Davis pepper-spray incident, and quite a large number have been published, by their creators, without attaching their names to the images. I would think that a publication such as Businessweek takes the job of properly citing all sources and images very seriously; that if they publish a disclaimer that states they cannot determine the author, then it seems that it is the sole responsibility of the author to step forward and claim their work. And that if they don't, they are tacitly allowing such an image to be used without expectation of compensation or credit. Furthermore, in most of these cases, authors of such work publish images on the Internet for the sole purpose of hoping they do go viral.

Problems with upload of File:Sunday afternoon with Lt Pike.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sunday afternoon with Lt Pike.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Pepper spraying cop meme.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pepper spraying cop meme.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)