User talk:Mijcofr

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Airplaneman  ✈  17:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Point Break, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 02:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! QED237&#160;(talk) 21:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Jason Varitek
Did you not read WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice? You can see what we usually add to infoboxes and catching no-hitters isn't one.--Yankees10 22:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


 * We obviously include huge records such as Ryan's K's, Bonds homers or Rose's hits. Lets not act like Varitek's catching no-hitters is even remotely comparable.--Yankees10 16:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to FIFA Ballon d'Or, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Reinstating same content a second time after a revert without explanation and discussion is disruptive. QED237&#160;(talk) 23:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
<i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 20:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2014–15 La Liga, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 22:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014–15 La Liga, you may be blocked from editing. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 22:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Top scorer in La Liga
Hi, Could you tell me why you disruptive try to chagne source for top scorer replacing a working well established link with a bare url? <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 22:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Curse of the Billy Goat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Murray. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Andy Murray, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry but you are waaaaayyyyyy wrong, I add a fact that Murray will end the year as number 2, and also add the ref, so please do not dare to call me a vandalizer, I only add facts, and never wanted to vandalize, I respect all Wikipedia users and myself --Mijcofr (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Murray. Yes you added a source, but the source does not support your statement. It merely says that he may still end up as #2 for the year, not that he will be. Meters (talk) 22:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

The source says Murray will be number 2 if Federer loses the ATP Finals final. Federer lost. ATPWORLDTOUR.COM MAIN PAGE: ATP RACE TO LONDON NUMBER 2 ANDY MURRAY "Best year-end finish of No. 2" What else do you want? . Federer WILL END AS NUMBER 3. --Mijcofr (talk) 23:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * When I left the message you did not have a source in the article saying that Federer had lost. All you had was a statement saying that Murray would be #2 if Federer lost. I didn't know Federer had lost and there wasn't anything in the article to say that he had lost (and for all I know he hadn't yet lost when you first made the entry). You can't assume that readers are going to know what happened. It was an improperly sourced statement. And as I say at the top of my talk page, please don't duplicate threads. Just keep it in one place. Meters (talk)

You are wrong, Federer already lost when I add the information about year-end number 2, and I repeat, I only add facts, and never wanted to vandalize, I respect all Wikipedia users and myself.--Mijcofr (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2017–18 UEFA Champions League. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)