User talk:Mikaey/Archives/2009/April

rage quit
Please contribute to the discussion at Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 7. Uncle G (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

MikaeyTest
When will this test be over? Is it safe to NOINDEX it? --Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, as soon as I can figure out whether or not my code is working. Hopefully in the next few minutes.  You can NOINDEX it, that's fine.  Matt (talk) 22:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. What was the test page for anyways? --Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aha! I should've checked your user page. Then I would've discovered that you run the ListasBot. Well good job on fixing your code. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A link to LisgasBot would have been helpful on the test page. :p No worries though. Everything worked out fine. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

About ListasBot
Hi, I just wanted to inform you that I mentioned your bot at WT:Categorization of people. I believe that the bot is incorrectly removing/omitting periods/full stops, but we'll see what others have to say.... MANdARAX •  XAЯAbИAM  01:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for making the change. I certainly never intended for you to shut down those capabilities of the bot while this was being decided. The fact that you did shows that you are a very conscientious botmaster. MANdARAX  •  XAЯAbИAM  22:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Your bot request
Hi Mikaey I wanted to let you know that Bots/Requests for approval/ListasBot 2 has been approved. Please visit the above link for more information. Thanks! BAGBot (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thank you! Matt (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * As follow-up, the archiving at Dae Mo Nim was done just right. Well done. – Quadell (talk) 12:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

re Listasbot
I think you could get away without one, but "I didn't think I needed one" tends to sound a bit lame six months down the road. Thus I would urge you to file a BRFA for it - Quadell's particularly active at the minute and would no have it seen to in a prompt manner (apologies, my editing's a bit too sparse to see much through from beginning to end at the moment). I don't think it would have any problem passing, so if you can hold yourself back for the week that would take, I would. Oh, and it sounds like a good solid idea (which makes me wonder why no-one's thought of it before), so good luck with that. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 16:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)