User talk:Mike.James 11

Birkenhead
It doesn't matter whether you register as an editor or not, your edit is simply WRONG. It is misinforming readers. Please read the article talk pages, and comment there. You cannot unilaterally change a definition made by an official statistical organisation, whether or not you think the definition is "right". Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The "official" statistical organisation is wrong in its "grouping" together none related areas, so yes I will continue to change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike.James 11  (talk • contribs) 11:47, 1 September 2015‎
 * Whether or not you believe it to be wrong is of no relevance whatsoever. The article simply reports the definitions that the ONS uses.  See WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS.  If you want to change the definition, tell ONS.  Please stop, and also remember to sign your posts using four of these: ~   Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your guidance. mikejames

September 2015
Hello, I'm EvilLair. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Birkenhead without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 13:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Birkenhead, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Again...  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 13:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Birkenhead, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 13:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Birkenhead.  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 13:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
Mike, it was made abundantly clear to you, in the above discussions, that you absolutely must not remove others' comments from Wikipedia talk pages. You've again chosen to ignore this. So, to prevent you from causing further harm, I have blocked your ability to edit Wikipedia. Wikipedia is built by discussion and consensus; if you're not willing to participate in that, and you actively seek to destroy other editor's discussion contributions, then you can't participate in Wikipedia at all. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 15:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)