User talk:Mike1438

August 2017
Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alpha Sigma Phi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 14:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please note that the data change is unsourced. Sources are required for challenged data.  Additionally, per the manual of style Headers are not capitalized. I will add a welcome message to help get you started with editing here.  Scr ★ pIron IV 14:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Alpha Sigma Phi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)