User talk:MikeDawg

Hi Mike

I just watched Secret Liason with Lochlyn Munro and cannot seem to find this movie to his credit on Wikipedia

Regards John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beefy1968 (talk • contribs) 23:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to the Wikipedia!
Welcome to the Wikipedia, MikeDawg! And thanks for the contribution to the Schizophrenia article. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:


 * Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
 * When you have time, take a look at The five pillars of Wikipedia, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
 * Always keep the notion of NPOV in mind, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your unique perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
 * If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
 * Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, Wikiquette, and you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: &#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;.

Best of luck, MikeDawg, and have fun! Ombudsman 06:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Bridezilla
Re source of Bridezilla - I'm sure I've seen it on book covers, and would dispute that a TV channel made it first. Got proof? --Blowdart 13:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I haven't found the proof, and have therefore removed the reference to them "inventing" the term. --MikeDawg

DFG
Chris, I have an email from Billy Moses, confirming Josh Gardner is Deaf Frat Guy, that has to count as a source, right? I have no idea how to cite that within Wikipedia however. This is in talking about The Adam Carolla Show --MikeDawg 13:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The problem is that it has to be a published source. We could probably get away with it if Billy had posted it on the message board, but a private email doesn't meet the threshold. -- ChrisB 16:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

SysAid
A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article SysAid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. A. B. (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bridezilla (term)


The article Bridezilla (term) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * dictdef of no significant notability outside of idiom

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 18:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)