User talk:MikeJKearney

A tag has been placed on David Joyce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 22:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Van_Allen_4.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Van_Allen_4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam ( T / C ) 06:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Curtis Bros. & Co
An editor has nominated Curtis Bros. & Co, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

A request on Lyons, Iowa Lumber History
While the source that that articel appears to have been copied from is definately out of copyright (1898!), generally raw text should not be used as the sole basis of an articel as it makes it (In this case), sound strange. If you can write it up and cite the book with it, that would likely prevent people tagging it with incoherent, et al. 68.39.174.238 18:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

David Joyce
I'm still not convinced that Daivd Joyce meets WP:BIO so I've listed the article at wikipedia:articles for deletion where other users can comment as to whether or not it should be deleted. The Afd entry can be found at Articles for deletion/David Joyce, your comments are welcomed there. Any questions, don't hesitiate to contact me on my talk page. Regards Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 01:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Your work on lumber articles
I'm impressed with the work you've been doing on the Clinton related lumber articles. It's not really my area of interest, but I respect efforts to add depth to Wikipedia. I'm no expert, but feel free to ask me if you need assistance.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the Wonderful Wiki World
of Louis Sullivan. There is a sort of convention developed there that is not 100% in use, but basically, if you wish to post more than one picture of a building then you should write at least a stub about the project and post it there. I'm thinking that you are going to be a great addition to this dedicated group. Carptrash 18:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh yes,
If you put at least something on your user page then your name will appear in blue instead of the red at your edits. This will indicate to others watching and reviewing your work that you are planning to be a long timer and you will gain (opinion) about 27% more credibility. Carptrash 18:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:October 6, 2006 1.JPG
File:October 6, 2006 1.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Moeszinger-Marquis (Armstrong) Building.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)