User talk:MikeLee2011

April 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to University of Northern Virginia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Orlady (talk) 14:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at University of Northern Virginia, you may be blocked from editing. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to University of Northern Virginia. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ''C'mon, Mike, you're making a TON of edits to this article and you're not explaining what you're doing. Please help your fellow editors out by providing an Edit Summary for EACH change! '' &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 14:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at University of Northern Virginia
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on University of Northern Virginia. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--Arxiloxos (talk) 19:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University of Northern Virginia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Repeatedly reverting edits (edit warring); repeated unexplained removal of sourced content., as you did at University of Northern Virginia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orlady (talk) 20:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)