User talk:MikeR613

Welcome to Wikipedia
- 2/0 (cont.) 06:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Scientific opinion on climate change
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed is on article probation. -- TS 19:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:A Wrinkle in Time (2003 film) are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 12:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Maimonides
Sorry your edit for caught up in another revert and I neglected to restore it. Apologies. Pipsally (talk) 13:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * np! Thanks for responding. MikeR613 (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits on Maimonides
Appreciate you editing Maimonides, keep up the good work!155.246.151.38 (talk) 17:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! You too. MikeR613 (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Some important issues (antisemitism wikipedia)
Hey Mike, it appears that there is anti-semitism on wikipedia. If you know any media outlets or reporters can you please bring their attention to this RSN? Some of these responses   are not okay. If the only way to deal with this is through media attention, then so be it. Thanks Mike!155.246.151.38 (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Some explanation
Hey Mike, good to see that you are actively interested in Maimonides and 13 principles and Hilchos Teshuva! Keep up your interest and learning!

In regards to your specific point, look over Hilchos teshuva where the Rambam does not hesitate to make lists. For example, lists of heretics. Since the Rambam did not explicitly list out the 13 principles, some have speculated on the reason for that. Not saying that they are correct, but there is some speculation.155.246.151.38 (talk) 21:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with speculation, "Why does the Rambam give something a special name here and not here." I don't say that the question bothers me, but that's me; that's fine that someone talks about it. However, the speculation should not include things that are obviously ruled out by the facts, like, Did the Rambam change his mind on whether these things are forbidden or carry severe punishment? What exactly is he supposed to have "retracted", his choice of wording in two different books?
 * I do think, though, that the new wording is much better than the old, leaving out some gratuitous (incorrect) statement about the Orthodox. I'm not as fussed about it as I was.MikeR613 (talk) 01:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Specifically, is your fourth revert so you risk being blocked William M. Connolley (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * As do you. Except that you guys are doing it as a team. And, anyone who adjudicates will see who is being unreasonable. MikeR613 (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Climate change topic area
Update for information, as mentioned at Talk:Steve McIntyre. . . dave souza, talk 22:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
O3000, Ret. (talk) 16:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)